https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16457
--- Comment #2 from Guy Harris ---
(In reply to fabian from comment #0)
> I can see, that tshark is still pointing to the captured files which were
> moved by the other service:
Yes, TShark simply should not have to have anywhere near
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16457
Guy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16457
--- Comment #5 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 36580 merged by Guy Harris:
Maintain cf->state, because file cleanup depends on it.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/36580
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16457
--- Comment #7 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 36581 merged by Guy Harris:
Maintain cf->state, because file cleanup depends on it.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/36581
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16457
--- Comment #8 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 36582 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris:
Maintain cf->state, because file cleanup depends on it.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/36582
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16457
Guy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16457
--- Comment #9 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 36582 merged by Guy Harris:
Maintain cf->state, because file cleanup depends on it.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/36582
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16457
--- Comment #6 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 36581 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris:
Maintain cf->state, because file cleanup depends on it.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/36581
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16457
--- Comment #4 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 36580 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris:
Maintain cf->state, because file cleanup depends on it.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/36580
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13597
Dylan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16453
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Kanstrup ---
Valgrind unfortunately did not complain. Tried the following with proper
80211_keys configured:
valgrind --tool=memcheck --leak-check=full ./run/tshark -r
../wireshark/test/captures/owe.pcapng.gz
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16453
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Kanstrup ---
This one was tricky. The error either means decryption failed or that tshark
for some other reason cannot parse ARP properly. I've executed the tests
successfully locally before uploading my patches
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16455
--- Comment #8 from Jaap Keuter ---
(In reply to leut...@netsniffing.ch from comment #6)
> B.t.w. If you select frame one in the enclosed file, the highlight works
> correct and markes all 48 bytes! (See Screenshot 3)
This only happens
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16453
--- Comment #9 from Dario Lombardo ---
(In reply to Mikael Kanstrup from comment #8)
> Not sure if you saw already but first I didn't. In the failing log there are
> a bunch of tests failing. Most of them are decryption tests but there
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16453
Peter Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael.kanst...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16453
--- Comment #4 from Dario Lombardo ---
Well, I didn't notice it's working again. That makes the search much more
difficult. I'll try with ASAN, I may be lucky with some memory issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16453
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Kanstrup ---
Not sure if you saw already but first I didn't. In the failing log there are a
bunch of tests failing. Most of them are decryption tests but there are other
failing tests too.
== 33 failed, 517
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14660
--- Comment #6 from David Perry ---
Created attachment 17693
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17693=edit
Screenshot showing the proposed UI changes
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16453
--- Comment #10 from Peter Wu ---
You could try to diff the full build logs for both builds, perhaps it is a bug
in the compiler or one of the other Ubuntu packages?
@Mikael it may be worth setting WIRESHARK_CONFIG_DIR=/x or HOME=/x
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14660
David Perry changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||boolean...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16453
--- Comment #7 from Dario Lombardo ---
ASAN didn't complain as well with your command.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16457
--- Comment #1 from fabian ---
The older version of tshark where this error does not occur was:
TShark (Wireshark) 2.4.16 (v2.4.16)
If I run:
$ ls -l /proc/$(ps -C tshark -o pid= | tr -d " ")/fd
I get some files and sockets, but only
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16455
--- Comment #6 from leut...@netsniffing.ch ---
B.t.w. If you select frame one in the enclosed file, the highlight works
correct and markes all 48 bytes! (See Screenshot 3)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16457
Bug ID: 16457
Summary: tshark logs: "...could not be opened: Too many open
files."
Product: Wireshark
Version: 3.2.2
Hardware: x86-64
OS: SuSE
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16453
Dario Lombardo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pe...@lekensteyn.nl
--- Comment
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16455
--- Comment #7 from leut...@netsniffing.ch ---
Created attachment 17691
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17691=edit
Screenshot 3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
26 matches
Mail list logo
