[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16658] Formatting issues with the wireshark(1) man page

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16658 --- Comment #9 from Sunil --- (In reply to Guy Harris from comment #4) > groff isn't an alternative to pod2man. pod2man converts pod (Plain Old > Documentation) files to man page files; groff formats text, including (but > not limited

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16658] Formatting issues with the wireshark(1) man page

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16658 --- Comment #10 from Sunil --- Created attachment 17853 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17853=edit Pic to show the alphabetical order and remove ambiguity of usernames The names in upper box are in

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16663] Dissector for ASTERIX CAT002 / 070 IDENT bits not properly decoded

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16663 --- Comment #11 from Jaap Keuter --- (In reply to Gerrit Code Review from comment #10) > Change 37635 had a related patch set uploaded by Jaap Keuter: > ASTERIX: CAT001/210 has an extension indicator, it's not fixed > >

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16667] New: Dissector for ASTERIX CAT001 / 050 does not parse out the top 3 bits of Octet 1

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16667 Bug ID: 16667 Summary: Dissector for ASTERIX CAT001 / 050 does not parse out the top 3 bits of Octet 1 Product: Wireshark Version: 3.2.4 Hardware: x86

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16662] Dissector for ASTERIX Category 001 / 210 does not recognize bit 1 as extension

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16662 --- Comment #3 from Jacqui --- (In reply to Jaap Keuter from comment #1) > Can you attach a sample capture file please? (no screenshot!) It's been submitted. Thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16662] Dissector for ASTERIX Category 001 / 210 does not recognize bit 1 as extension

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16662 --- Comment #2 from Jacqui --- Created attachment 17855 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17855=edit PCAP file with CAT001/120 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16666] New: Bluetooth Advertising Extension packet falsely flagged as malformed

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1 Bug ID: 1 Summary: Bluetooth Advertising Extension packet falsely flagged as malformed Product: Wireshark Version: Git Hardware: x86 OS: Windows

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16668] Decoding Extended Emergency number list IE length.

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16668 Ranjini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ranjin...@gmail.com -- You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16668] Decoding Extended Emergency number list IE length.

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16668 --- Comment #2 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37644 had a related patch set uploaded by Pascal Quantin: NAS 5GS: fix dissection of extended emergency number list IE https://code.wireshark.org/review/37644 -- You are receiving this

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15378] Display packet number for corrupted capture file

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15378 Dylan changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|bugzilla-ad...@wireshark.or |daul...@gmail.com |g

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16667] Dissector for ASTERIX CAT001 / 050 does not parse out the top 3 bits of Octet 1

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16667 --- Comment #2 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37654 had a related patch set uploaded by Jaap Keuter: ASTERIX: add dissection of I001/050 and I001/060 https://code.wireshark.org/review/37654 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16668] Decoding Extended Emergency number list IE length.

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16668 --- Comment #4 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37653 had a related patch set uploaded by Pascal Quantin: NAS 5GS: fix dissection of extended emergency number list IE https://code.wireshark.org/review/37653 -- You are receiving this

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16627] DHCPv6: corrected criteria used for malformed errors and added support for partial DNS names

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16627 --- Comment #2 from Cal Turney --- Added issues and fixes/enhancements: Routine "dhcpv6_domain()" of packet-dhcpv6.c has the following issues: a. It is unaware of partial (relative) domain names which unlike FQDNs must *not* be root

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16630] Add support for GB18030 (a widely used Chinese encoding standard)

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16630 --- Comment #9 from John Thacker --- (In reply to Sidhant Bansal from comment #5) > (In reply to Jaap Keuter) > >> Maybe it's a good idea to attach a sample capture > >> file with data in this encoding. > Please find attached a small

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16662] Dissector for ASTERIX Category 001 / 210 does not recognize bit 1 as extension

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16662 --- Comment #4 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37635 merged by Alexis La Goutte: ASTERIX: CAT001/210 has an extension indicator, it's not fixed https://code.wireshark.org/review/37635 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16668] Decoding Extended Emergency number list IE length.

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16668 Jaap Keuter changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Main site - |Dissection engine

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16662] Dissector for ASTERIX Category 001 / 210 does not recognize bit 1 as extension

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16662 Jaap Keuter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|INCOMPLETE |IN_PROGRESS -- You are receiving

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16667] Dissector for ASTERIX CAT001 / 050 does not parse out the top 3 bits of Octet 1

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16667 Jaap Keuter changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|Normal |Enhancement

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16668] Decoding Extended Emergency number list IE length.

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16668 Ranjini changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|Low |Medium -- You are receiving this mail

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16029] Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2019-08-31-15021.pcap

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16029 Gerald Combs changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bi

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16668] Decoding Extended Emergency number list IE length.

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16668 --- Comment #3 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37644 merged by Alexis La Goutte: NAS 5GS: fix dissection of extended emergency number list IE https://code.wireshark.org/review/37644 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16668] New: Decoding Extended Emergency number list IE length.

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16668 Bug ID: 16668 Summary: Decoding Extended Emergency number list IE length. Product: Web sites Version: N/A Hardware: x86 OS: Windows 10 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16662] Dissector for ASTERIX Category 001 / 210 does not recognize bit 1 as extension

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16662 --- Comment #8 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37651 had a related patch set uploaded by Jaap Keuter: ASTERIX: CAT001/210 has an extension indicator, it's not fixed https://code.wireshark.org/review/37651 -- You are receiving this

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16662] Dissector for ASTERIX Category 001 / 210 does not recognize bit 1 as extension

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16662 --- Comment #6 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37649 had a related patch set uploaded by Jaap Keuter: ASTERIX: CAT001/210 has an extension indicator, it's not fixed https://code.wireshark.org/review/37649 -- You are receiving this

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16662] Dissector for ASTERIX Category 001 / 210 does not recognize bit 1 as extension

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16662 --- Comment #7 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37650 had a related patch set uploaded by Jaap Keuter: ASTERIX: CAT001/210 has an extension indicator, it's not fixed https://code.wireshark.org/review/37650 -- You are receiving this

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16662] Dissector for ASTERIX Category 001 / 210 does not recognize bit 1 as extension

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16662 --- Comment #5 from Jaap Keuter --- (In reply to Jacqui from comment #3) > (In reply to Jaap Keuter from comment #1) > > Can you attach a sample capture file please? (no screenshot!) > > It's been submitted. Thank you! Found it, in

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16562] Install extcap executables by default on Windows

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16562 --- Comment #3 from Chuck Craft --- https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/37185/ There are a couple versions of the patch with different command line syntax. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16658] Formatting issues with the wireshark(1) man page

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16658 --- Comment #3 from Sunil --- (In reply to Guy Harris from comment #2) > That shows only the authors list; are there other parts with issues? Sorry, but I could add only one attachment there. I read all the man page and found few issues

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16655] Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2020-06-24-30868.pcap

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16655 --- Comment #7 from Guy Harris --- *** Bug 16665 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16665] Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2020-06-30-17766.pcap

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16665 Guy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16627] DHCPv6: corrected criteria used for malformed errors and added support for partial DNS names

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16627 --- Comment #3 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37661 had a related patch set uploaded by Cal Turney: DHCPv6: fix for bogus errors. Detailed error msgs https://code.wireshark.org/review/37661 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16668] Decoding Extended Emergency number list IE length.

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16668 --- Comment #5 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37653 merged by Anders Broman: NAS 5GS: fix dissection of extended emergency number list IE https://code.wireshark.org/review/37653 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16666] Bluetooth Advertising Extension packet falsely flagged as malformed

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1 Alexis La Goutte changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |INCOMPLETE Ever

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16667] Dissector for ASTERIX CAT001 / 050 does not parse out the top 3 bits of Octet 1

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16667 --- Comment #3 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37654 merged by Anders Broman: ASTERIX: add dissection of I001/050 and I001/060 https://code.wireshark.org/review/37654 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16524] packet-eap.c: Some identity string values have periods so tokenization fails within dissect_eap_identity_wlan()

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16524 --- Comment #6 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37250 merged by Anders Broman: EAP: Handling Identities with Periods https://code.wireshark.org/review/37250 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16524] packet-eap.c: Some identity string values have periods so tokenization fails within dissect_eap_identity_wlan()

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16524 Alexis La Goutte changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16537] packet-eap.c: Replace several unique EAP identity fields with a single identity field, and add some metadata EAP Identity Fields

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16537 Bug 16537 depends on bug 16524, which changed state. Bug 16524 Summary: packet-eap.c: Some identity string values have periods so tokenization fails within dissect_eap_identity_wlan()

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16668] Decoding Extended Emergency number list IE length.

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16668 Pascal Quantin changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16668] Decoding Extended Emergency number list IE length.

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16668 --- Comment #1 from Ranjini --- Created attachment 17857 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17857=edit Extended Emergency Number list IE Decoding image Extended emergency number list IE length is 2 octet

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 15378] Display packet number for corrupted capture file

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15378 --- Comment #2 from Dylan --- I'm not sure if this is new, or what Guy was saying 2 years ago but... If I do this, then it shows where the error is: 1. File -> Open 2. Select the File (but don't click Open) 3. Next to "Size:", it shows

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16668] Decoding Extended Emergency number list IE length.

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16668 Pascal Quantin changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16658] Formatting issues with the wireshark(1) man page

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16658 --- Comment #4 from Guy Harris --- (In reply to Sunil from comment #3) > (In reply to Guy Harris from comment #2) > Thanks for the reply. I've only worked with pod2man as of now. But I'll > check the same with groff too. groff isn't an

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16664] "invalid timestamp" for Systemd Journal Export Block

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16664 Alexis La Goutte changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ger...@wireshark.org -- You

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16658] Formatting issues with the wireshark(1) man page

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16658 --- Comment #5 from Guy Harris --- (In reply to Sunil from comment #3) > (In reply to Guy Harris from comment #2) > > > That shows only the authors list; are there other parts with issues? > Sorry, but I could add only one attachment

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16658] Formatting issues with the wireshark(1) man page

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16658 --- Comment #6 from Guy Harris --- (In reply to Sunil from comment #3) > (In reply to Guy Harris from comment #2) > > > That shows only the authors list; are there other parts with issues? > Sorry, but I could add only one attachment

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16663] Dissector for ASTERIX CAT002 / 070 IDENT bits not properly decoded

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16663 Jaap Keuter changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16663] Dissector for ASTERIX CAT002 / 070 IDENT bits not properly decoded

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16663 --- Comment #10 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37635 had a related patch set uploaded by Jaap Keuter: ASTERIX: CAT001/210 has an extension indicator, it's not fixed https://code.wireshark.org/review/37635 -- You are receiving this

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16658] Formatting issues with the wireshark(1) man page

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16658 --- Comment #7 from Sunil --- (In reply to Guy Harris from comment #6) > Given that we have a User's Guide, I'm not sure we should be discussing the > menus *at all* in the man page; we should perhaps focus on command-line > arguments

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16658] Formatting issues with the wireshark(1) man page

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16658 --- Comment #8 from Sunil --- (In reply to Guy Harris from comment #6) > Given that we have a User's Guide, I'm not sure we should be discussing the > menus *at all* in the man page; we should perhaps focus on command-line > arguments

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16664] "invalid timestamp" for Systemd Journal Export Block

2020-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16664 --- Comment #1 from gwaeber --- Related, the PCAP NG spec draft specifies that the entry must contain a __REALTIME_TIMESTAMP field and that it "could potentially be used to include arbitrary key-value data", but Wireshark currently