https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12882
Michael Mann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12882
--- Comment #17 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 21954 merged by Michael Mann:
[TDS] Convert to using tcp_dissect_pdus.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/21954
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes._
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12882
--- Comment #16 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 21954 had a related patch set uploaded by Michael Mann:
[TDS] Convert to using tcp_dissect_pdus.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/21954
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12882
--- Comment #15 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 19125 merged by Michael Mann:
[TDS] Convert to using tcp_dissect_pdus.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/19125
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes._
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12882
--- Comment #14 from Michael Mann ---
(In reply to Nathan Cole from comment #13)
> Created attachment 15129 [details]
> TDS response message with many TDS "packets"
>
> Packets 285 - 489 are not processed correctly after change 19125 patc
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12882
--- Comment #13 from Nathan Cole ---
Created attachment 15129
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15129&action=edit
TDS response message with many TDS "packets"
Packets 285 - 489 are not processed correctly after c
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12882
--- Comment #12 from Michael Mann ---
(In reply to Guy Harris from comment #11)
> (If you mean "how often does an arbitrary packet in a TCP connection contain
> the end of a multi-segment PDU and the beginning of the next PDU", the
> answe
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12882
--- Comment #11 from Guy Harris ---
(In reply to Michael Mann from comment #10)
> (In reply to Guy Harris from comment #9)
> > If there are TCP dissectors that do reassembly, use a heuristic, and don't
> > use conversation_set_dissector(),
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12882
--- Comment #10 from Michael Mann ---
(In reply to Guy Harris from comment #9)
> If there are TCP dissectors that do reassembly, use a heuristic, and don't
> use conversation_set_dissector(), there can be cases where the reassembly
> will
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12882
Guy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|x86 |All
OS|Windows 10
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12882
--- Comment #9 from Guy Harris ---
(In reply to Michael Mann from comment #8)
> (In reply to Gerrit Code Review from comment #7)
> > Change 19125 had a related patch set uploaded by Michael Mann:
> > [TDS] Convert to using tcp_dissect_pdus
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12882
--- Comment #8 from Michael Mann ---
(In reply to Gerrit Code Review from comment #7)
> Change 19125 had a related patch set uploaded by Michael Mann:
> [TDS] Convert to using tcp_dissect_pdus.
>
> https://code.wireshark.org/review/19125
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12882
--- Comment #7 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 19125 had a related patch set uploaded by Michael Mann:
[TDS] Convert to using tcp_dissect_pdus.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/19125
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are w
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12882
--- Comment #6 from Michael Mann ---
(In reply to Michael Mann from comment #5)
> I know I could put this capture through a debugger to find the answer, but
> how is this capture dissected as TNS? TNS uses a (non-IANA) registered TCP
> po
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12882
Michael Mann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mman...@netscape.net
--- Comment #
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12882
Guy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12882
--- Comment #3 from Guy Harris ---
(In reply to Uxorious from comment #2)
> Maybe the heuristic detection should be off by default as most people will
> not be encountering TDS packets?
Or maybe the heuristic should be strengthened, if p
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12882
--- Comment #2 from Uxorious ---
Thanks for the clarification.
Maybe the heuristic detection should be off by default as most people will not
be encountering TDS packets?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12882
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pascal.quan...@gmail.com
--- Com
19 matches
Mail list logo
