https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
--- Comment #13 from Christopher Maynard ---
(In reply to Christopher Maynard from comment #12)
> (In reply to Guy Harris from comment #10)
> > Evan, should this check be done in wmem_list_foreach() instead?
>
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
--- Comment #12 from Christopher Maynard ---
(In reply to Guy Harris from comment #10)
> Evan, should this check be done in wmem_list_foreach() instead?
... as well as in wmem_destroy_list()?
--
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
--- Comment #11 from Stig Bjørlykke ---
*** Bug 13660 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
--- Comment #10 from Guy Harris ---
Evan, should this check be done in wmem_list_foreach() instead?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
Guy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eapa...@gmail.com
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
Guy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
--- Comment #9 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 21329 merged by Guy Harris:
Don't crash if we have no BOOTP option preferences.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/21329
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
--- Comment #8 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 21329 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris:
Don't crash if we have no BOOTP option preferences.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/21329
--
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
Guy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
--
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
--- Comment #7 from Guy Harris ---
That sure looks like a null pointer dereference (and the crash report from
macOS would probably have indicated that as well, if I'd bothered to look at
the failing address).
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
--- Comment #6 from Pascal Quantin ---
*** Bug 13659 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
--- Comment #5 from Guy Harris ---
(In reply to Guy Harris from comment #2)
> I'll look at trying with an ASAN build.
Mr. ASAN says:
ASAN:DEADLYSIGNAL
=
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
--- Comment #4 from Pascal Quantin ---
*** Bug 13658 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
Alexis La Goutte changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
--- Comment #2 from Guy Harris ---
(In reply to Guy Harris from comment #1)
> Possibly a result of If52c00bbc23d89386ba3e777600f665609856de0.
Backing that change out seems to prevent the crash.
I'll look at trying
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
Guy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|x86-64 |All
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Low
18 matches
Mail list logo