[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14113] AMQP 0.9 dissector confused when first packet contains several frames
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14113 Michael Mannchanged: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14113] AMQP 0.9 dissector confused when first packet contains several frames
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14113 --- Comment #5 from Gerrit Code Review--- Change 24109 merged by Michael Mann: AMQP: Add dissector table for versions so they can be dissected with Decode As https://code.wireshark.org/review/24109 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14113] AMQP 0.9 dissector confused when first packet contains several frames
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14113 --- Comment #4 from Gerrit Code Review--- Change 24108 merged by Michael Mann: Autodetect more AMQP 0-9 captures https://code.wireshark.org/review/24108 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14113] AMQP 0.9 dissector confused when first packet contains several frames
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14113 --- Comment #3 from Magnus Henoch--- I pushed two commits with possible solutions for this. The first one changes the autodetection to consider the possibility of a 0-9 packet containing two frames. The second one adds a preference for forcing a certain protocol version. I'm not sure if it would be appropriate to use either of them or both. The first commit introduces a small possibility of misdetecting 0-10 or 1.0 traffic, though I think it should be very small. The second commit offers a way of overriding this if the autodetection code gets it wrong - or a way of getting the behaviour I want for 0-9 traffic. Any feedback is welcome. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14113] AMQP 0.9 dissector confused when first packet contains several frames
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14113 --- Comment #1 from Gerrit Code Review--- Change 24108 had a related patch set uploaded by Magnus Henoch: Autodetect more AMQP 0-9 captures https://code.wireshark.org/review/24108 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14113] AMQP 0.9 dissector confused when first packet contains several frames
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14113 --- Comment #2 from Gerrit Code Review--- Change 24109 had a related patch set uploaded by Magnus Henoch: Add preference for AMQP version detection https://code.wireshark.org/review/24109 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe