https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14134
--- Comment #17 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 23998 merged by Pascal Quantin:
Do not add Npcap path if npf.sys service is found
https://code.wireshark.org/review/23998
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14134
--- Comment #16 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 23998 had a related patch set uploaded by Pascal Quantin:
Do not add Npcap path if npf.sys service is found
https://code.wireshark.org/review/23998
--
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14134
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14134
--- Comment #15 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 23997 merged by Alexis La Goutte:
Do not add Npcap path if npf.sys service is found
https://code.wireshark.org/review/23997
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14134
--- Comment #14 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 23997 had a related patch set uploaded by Pascal Quantin:
Do not add Npcap path if npf.sys service is found
https://code.wireshark.org/review/23997
--
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14134
--- Comment #13 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 23969 merged by Anders Broman:
Do not add Npcap path if npf.sys service is found
https://code.wireshark.org/review/23969
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14134
--- Comment #12 from Pascal Quantin ---
(In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #7)
> Thanks for the suggestion.
> I'm also gonna launch a new thread on our development mailing list to see
> whether it is time
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14134
--- Comment #11 from Guy Harris ---
(In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #9)
> I have a patch ready that does not append system32/Npcap to the list of
> folders for dlls serach when npf service exists. Do you think
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14134
--- Comment #10 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 23969 had a related patch set uploaded by Pascal Quantin:
Do not add Npcap path if npf.sys service is found
https://code.wireshark.org/review/23969
--
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14134
--- Comment #9 from Pascal Quantin ---
Hi Guy,
I have a patch ready that does not append system32/Npcap to the list of folders
for dlls serach when npf service exists. Do you think it is sufficient to
workaround
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14134
--- Comment #8 from Guy Harris ---
(In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #4)
> Wireshark, on the opposite, is loading packet.dll from system32 folder.
It's loading packet.dll because caputils/capture_wpcap_packet.c
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14134
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|INCOMPLETE
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14134
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Miller ---
(In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #4)
> I do not know anything about wpcap.dll code. Wireshark is adding
> system32/Npcap folder to the dll search path with a call to
>
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14134
--- Comment #5 from Pascal Quantin ---
This makes me wonder how the Npcap / WinPcap coexistence mode is supposed to
work exactly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14134
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14134
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|Windows 10
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14134
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|INCOMPLETE
17 matches
Mail list logo