https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14957
Guy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|CONFIRMED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14957
--- Comment #8 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 28722 merged by Guy Harris:
Supply a 0s/0ns value for invalid time value lengths.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/28722
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14957
--- Comment #7 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 28722 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris:
Supply a 0s/0ns value for invalid time value lengths.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/28722
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14957
--- Comment #6 from Peter Wu ---
*** Bug 14976 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14957
--- Comment #5 from Peter Wu ---
*** Bug 14969 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14957
--- Comment #4 from Peter Wu ---
*** Bug 14967 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14957
--- Comment #3 from Peter Wu ---
*** Bug 14959 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14957
Peter Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pe...@lekensteyn.nl
--- Comment #2
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14957
--- Comment #1 from Guy Harris ---
Probably some dissector is adding a field that's relative time in seconds,
setting the secs field of an nstime_t to the field value, and forgetting to set
the nsecs field to 0.
--
You are receiving
