[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 2803] Wireshark build fails if c-ares version < 1.5

2016-10-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2803

Guy Harris  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|GTK+ UI |Dissection engine
   ||(libwireshark)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 2803] Wireshark build fails if c-ares version < 1.5

2009-01-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2803


Gerald Combs  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe


[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 2803] Wireshark build fails if c-ares version < 1.5

2009-01-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2803


Gerald Combs  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Attachment #2602|review_for_checkin? |review_for_checkin+
   Flag||




--- Comment #10 from Gerald Combs   2009-01-06 10:32:46 
PDT ---
(From update of attachment 2602)
Checked in in r27169.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe


[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 2803] Wireshark build fails if c-ares version < 1.5

2008-12-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2803


Stephen Fisher  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Attachment #2602||review_for_checkin?
   Flag||




--- Comment #9 from Stephen Fisher   2008-12-25 
09:42:30 PDT ---
(From update of attachment 2602)
mark for review


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe


[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 2803] Wireshark build fails if c-ares version < 1.5

2008-12-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2803


Frederic Leroy  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Attachment #2600 is|0   |1
   obsolete||




--- Comment #8 from Frederic Leroy   2008-12-25 08:16:14 PDT 
---
Created an attachment (id=2602)
 --> (https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2602)
fix ares version check

New patch for ares version checking, against revision 27114
Checked and tested this time.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe


[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 2803] Wireshark build fails if c-ares version < 1.5

2008-12-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2803





--- Comment #7 from Frederic Leroy   2008-12-24 11:06:49 PDT 
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (From update of attachment 2600 [details])
> If and when c-ares 2.0 is released, wouldn't "((  ARES_VERSION_MAJOR >= 0 ) &&
> ( ARES_VERSION_MINOR  < 5 ) )" match against it?
> 
> I checked in a modified version of your patch, which uses "((
> ARES_VERSION_MAJOR <= 1 ) && ( ARES_VERSION_MINOR  < 5 ) )" in r27112. Can you
> try it out?
> 

Of course, my fault !

Even with that, it's not optimal, I think we wan't something like 

( ( ARES_MAJOR_VERSION < 1 ) \
 || ( 1 == ARES_MAJOR_VERSION && ARES_MINOR_VERSION < 5 ) )

I will test both and tell you.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe


[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 2803] Wireshark build fails if c-ares version < 1.5

2008-12-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2803


Gerald Combs  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Attachment #2600||review_for_checkin+
   Flag||




--- Comment #6 from Gerald Combs   2008-12-24 10:14:28 
PDT ---
(From update of attachment 2600)
If and when c-ares 2.0 is released, wouldn't "((  ARES_VERSION_MAJOR >= 0 ) &&
( ARES_VERSION_MINOR  < 5 ) )" match against it?

I checked in a modified version of your patch, which uses "((
ARES_VERSION_MAJOR <= 1 ) && ( ARES_VERSION_MINOR  < 5 ) )" in r27112. Can you
try it out?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe


[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 2803] Wireshark build fails if c-ares version < 1.5

2008-12-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2803





--- Comment #5 from Frederic Leroy   2008-12-24 01:41:09 PDT 
---
Created an attachment (id=2600)
 --> (https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2600)
fix ares version test

I give it a try after reverting c-ares to 1.4.0 on my system.
This doesn't work.
In addr_resolv.c , the test "#if ARES_VERSION <= 0x140" is always false.

This patch fix it.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe


[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 2803] Wireshark build fails if c-ares version < 1.5

2008-12-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2803





--- Comment #4 from Bill Meier   2008-12-23 12:45:00 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> We aren't using the timeout counter, so using c-ares <= 1.4.0 shouldn't be an
> issue. I checked in a change in r27096 which _should_ fix the problem. Bill,
> can you try it out?
> 

Unfortunately my Fedora system bit the dust some time ago when I tried to
upgrade to Fedora 9 so I'm afraid I won't be able to help at this point.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe


[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 2803] Wireshark build fails if c-ares version < 1.5

2008-12-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2803





--- Comment #3 from Gerald Combs   2008-12-23 10:41:24 
PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Same problem on gentoo when compiling wireshark trunk.
> Moving to c-ares 1.5.3 resolv it.

BTW, 1.5.3 has a pretty serious bug in ares_parse_ptr_reply. You might want to
use 1.5.2 or 1.6.0 instead.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe


[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 2803] Wireshark build fails if c-ares version < 1.5

2008-12-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2803


Gerald Combs  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ger...@wireshark.org




--- Comment #2 from Gerald Combs   2008-12-23 10:39:43 
PDT ---
We aren't using the timeout counter, so using c-ares <= 1.4.0 shouldn't be an
issue. I checked in a change in r27096 which _should_ fix the problem. Bill,
can you try it out?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe


[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 2803] Wireshark build fails if c-ares version < 1.5

2008-12-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2803


Frederic Leroy  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||fr...@starox.org




--- Comment #1 from Frederic Leroy   2008-12-23 07:42:31 PDT 
---
Same problem on gentoo when compiling wireshark trunk.
Moving to c-ares 1.5.3 resolv it.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe