[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 4191] Wireshark Portable installer outdated

2014-10-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4191 Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 4191] Wireshark Portable installer outdated

2014-09-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4191 --- Comment #17 from Gerrit Code Review gerrit-do-not-re...@wireshark.org --- Change 3962 had a related patch set uploaded by Gerald Combs: Fix PortableApps packaging. https://code.wireshark.org/review/3962 -- You are receiving this mail

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 4191] Wireshark Portable installer outdated

2010-12-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4191 --- Comment #15 from Chris Maynard christopher.mayn...@gtech.com 2010-12-29 12:50:07 PST --- (In reply to comment #14) The absolute easiest thing to do is to use the PA.c Installer to generate each package as it will generate all the

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 4191] Wireshark Portable installer outdated

2010-12-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4191 --- Comment #14 from John T. Haller bugzil...@johnhaller.com 2010-12-27 22:07:18 PST --- (In reply to comment #13) John, if we want to go with the first one, do you see any issues with that? The absolute easiest thing to do is to use

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 4191] Wireshark Portable installer outdated

2010-12-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4191 --- Comment #10 from Chris Maynard christopher.mayn...@gtech.com 2010-12-15 08:41:11 PST --- (In reply to comment #9) Yes, you just feed a directory as a command line argument to PortableApps.comInstaller.exe and it'll create the

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 4191] Wireshark Portable installer outdated

2010-12-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4191 --- Comment #11 from Chris Maynard christopher.mayn...@gtech.com 2010-12-15 08:55:33 PST --- Created an attachment (id=5618) -- (https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5618) An initial patch for illustration, likely not

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 4191] Wireshark Portable installer outdated

2010-12-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4191 --- Comment #12 from Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org 2010-12-15 11:31:40 PST --- (In reply to comment #10) Personally I'm now running NSIS 2.46 from http://nsis.sourceforge.net/Main_Page, but the Windows-XP-x86 buildbot is currently

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 4191] Wireshark Portable installer outdated

2010-12-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4191 --- Comment #13 from Chris Maynard christopher.mayn...@gtech.com 2010-12-15 12:56:47 PST --- (In reply to comment #12) It looks like Unicode NSIS installs into c:\Program Files\NSIS\Unicode by default. Could we add a MAKENSIS_UNICODE

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 4191] Wireshark Portable installer outdated

2010-12-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4191 --- Comment #8 from Chris Maynard christopher.mayn...@gtech.com 2010-12-14 11:24:17 PST --- (In reply to comment #7) The installer is now self-contained and, while it will generate NSIS code you could drop into your build system, it will

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 4191] Wireshark Portable installer outdated

2010-12-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4191 --- Comment #9 from John T. Haller bugzil...@johnhaller.com 2010-12-14 14:39:24 PST --- (In reply to comment #8) I'm not entirely sure how this will change the builds for us. Currently, it looks like only the Windows-XP-x86 buildbot is

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 4191] Wireshark Portable installer outdated

2010-12-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4191 --- Comment #7 from John T. Haller bugzil...@johnhaller.com 2010-12-09 07:18:19 PST --- (In reply to comment #6) John, any update? BTW, I see the installer is now at 2.0.6. I'm curious as to how many updates there have been since

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 4191] Wireshark Portable installer outdated

2010-12-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4191 --- Comment #6 from Chris Maynard christopher.mayn...@gtech.com 2010-12-01 11:15:34 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) John, can you be a little more specific about the changes that need to be made? E.g. how should the PortableApps.com

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 4191] Wireshark Portable installer outdated

2009-11-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4191 Jaap Keuter jaap.keu...@xs4all.nl changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 4191] Wireshark Portable installer outdated

2009-11-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4191 --- Comment #2 from John T. Haller bugzil...@johnhaller.com 2009-11-13 12:35:49 PDT --- Hopefully it can for 1.2.4. As soon as it is, we can list it on PortableApps.com and start promoting it to our users. The older installer won't

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 4191] Wireshark Portable installer outdated

2009-11-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4191 --- Comment #3 from Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org 2009-11-13 16:41:38 PDT --- It shouldn't be a problem to keep the installer generator up to date on the build server. What changes need to be made in SVN (e.g. to the makefile)?

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 4191] Wireshark Portable installer outdated

2009-11-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4191 --- Comment #4 from John T. Haller bugzil...@johnhaller.com 2009-11-13 17:35:48 PDT --- No changes need be made from 1.2.3 (other than updating the PackageVersion and DisplayVersion in App\AppInfo\appinfo.ini, which I believe is