didier wrote:
> Or maybe g_assert is a no ops?
>
> Bug 1071
> http://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/captures/fuzz-2006-08-27-19853.pcap
>
> ./tshark -r /tmp/fuzz-2006-08-27-19853.pcap
> frame 281
>
> packet-image-png.c:line 274 g_assert(len<10);
> tries to decode after png IEN
Done.
Ulf Lamping wrote:
> Hi Gerald!
>
> The current 0.99.3 is still missing, could you add it?
>
> Regards, ULFL
> ___
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
_
Well, I'm very much for dropping GTK-1 support:Look at the source in gtk/ to see the effort it takes to take all thedifferences between gtk1 and gtk2 into account as well as the effortto maintain both versions. Compare this with the one-time-effort toset up a working compile time env for gtk2 for
Any
pointers/writeups on how to add a dissector using asn2wrs?
It
wasn't clear to me from reading the wiki page.
Thanks,
Jacob
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wire
Hi,
Le dimanche 27 août 2006 à 19:10 +0200, Ulf Lamping a écrit :
> >
> Yes, I'm very sure that I'm working with the very latest sources, only
> minutes ago since the latest update ;-)
>
> It seems that the Win32 port doesn't stumble over this bug (happens from
> time to time, e.g. I've had "
didier wrote:
> Hi
> Le dimanche 27 août 2006 à 16:54 +0200, Ulf Lamping a écrit :
>
>> Hi List!
>>
>> Can someone with access to a MAC OS-X machine have a look at the recent
>> bugzilla fuzz entries.
>>
>> I tried but cannot reproduce them on Win32.
>>
> Are you sure you're using the late
Hi,
Le dimanche 27 août 2006 à 13:38 +0200, Joerg Mayer a écrit :
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 06:17:28PM +0200, Andreas Fink wrote:
> > I have however to disagree on dropping support for GTK version 1.2. I
> > currently build wireshark on MacOS X wiht GTK 1.2 for a good reason.
> > The dependencies
Hi
Le dimanche 27 août 2006 à 16:54 +0200, Ulf Lamping a écrit :
> Hi List!
>
> Can someone with access to a MAC OS-X machine have a look at the recent
> bugzilla fuzz entries.
>
> I tried but cannot reproduce them on Win32.
Are you sure you're using the latest trunk? From the error it looks lik
Hi List!
Can someone with access to a MAC OS-X machine have a look at the recent
bugzilla fuzz entries.
I tried but cannot reproduce them on Win32.
Regards, ULFL
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailm
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 03:10:57PM +0200, Ulf Lamping wrote:
> I've commented this line out for some time now, without getting any
> other negative effect while fuzz-testing and elsewhere.
>
> As I didn't digged deeper into that code: is it ok to simply remove this
> assert (with a comment, of c
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 06:17:28PM +0200, Andreas Fink wrote:
> I have however to disagree on dropping support for GTK version 1.2. I
> currently build wireshark on MacOS X wiht GTK 1.2 for a good reason.
> The dependencies of GTK is GLIB and nothing else. If you build it
> with GTK2, then you
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 12:06:41AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=19038
>
> User: guy
> Date: 2006/08/26 12:06 AM
>
> Log:
> Don't define the Aironet/Cisco Wireless OUI ourselves; get it from
> .
Should we move the remaining v
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 09:55:02PM +, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
> ok i removed those conditionals so it always dissects the bit.
>
> to me it looks a bit funny to have the LG bit dissected and flagged
> for broadcasts. maybe we should ignore the LG bit for broadcast
> packets?
Definitely. It
Hi Gerald!
The current 0.99.3 is still missing, could you add it?
Regards, ULFL
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
14 matches
Mail list logo
