Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problem with docbook build process

2006-09-08 Thread Ulf Lamping
Joerg Mayer wrote: Hello, for some reasons not really clear to me, the build process for the documentation tries to download some files from the docbook repository: 34.327847 192.168.0.3 - 217.237.150.115 DNS Standard query A docbook.sourceforge.net 34.391786 217.237.150.115 -

Re: [Wireshark-dev] win32: nmake setup: can't find cl

2006-09-08 Thread Jacques, Olivier \(OpenCall Test Infra\)
Tim, Thanks for your answer. Have you done the following: Do you intend to build using MSVC CYGWIN tools? Was your Win32 build environment setup using the Developers Guide, sections 2.3 4.6.2? Yes. If you intended to use MSVC CYGWIN tools, a command prompt [DOS prompt] is the way to

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Follow up to making register.c - python problem - patch

2006-09-08 Thread Neil Piercy
I submitted this a few days ago, but it hasn't made it to the SVN as far as I can see - is there a problem with it (I can believe that ;-), or did it just overflow the stack ? Neil Index: asn1/rrlp/Makefile.nmake === ---

Re: [Wireshark-dev] A question about debug using DDD

2006-09-08 Thread patrick.yan
Hello Nathan, Many thanks for your answer! I'm out of office last 3 days. A little thing can be added: the source path is /asn1/your_protocol, not /epan/dissectors. Have a nice weekend patrick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ext Ulf

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Follow up to making register.c - python problem - patch

2006-09-08 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 10:24:24AM +0100, Neil Piercy wrote: I submitted this a few days ago, but it hasn't made it to the SVN as far as I can see - is there a problem with it (I can believe that ;-), or did it just overflow the stack ? The preferred way to send patches is to send the to the

[Wireshark-dev] How to add a string to the tree

2006-09-08 Thread prashanth joshi
Hi, My query is : How to add a string i.e. a string which is part of the gtp packet , to the tree. I feel proto_tree_add_string ( ) wont work becos: suppose packet contains an integer value, then val_to_str( ) operates on that value and then returns a string. Now proto_tree_add_string( )

Re: [Wireshark-dev] A question about ASN.1 encoding in wireshark

2006-09-08 Thread Anders Broman \(AL/EAB\)
Title: A question about ASN.1 encoding in wireshark Hi, Those files are generated by asn2wrs and used to build packet-foo.c[h] after which they are deleted ( if the option to keep them are not used), line numbers in the packet-foo.c[h] are made to refere to the intermediate files which is

Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to add a string to the tree

2006-09-08 Thread ronnie sahlberg
maybe studying the code, reading the documentation and looking at other dissectors will reveal the answer? On 9/8/06, prashanth joshi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, My query is : How to add a string i.e. a string which is part of the gtp packet , to the tree. I feel

Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to add a string to the tree

2006-09-08 Thread Anders Broman \(AL/EAB\)
Hi, If a field in a protocol is a string the easiest way to add it to the protocol tree is: proto_tree_add_item(tree, hf_xx, offset,length, FALSE); Example delaration of corresponding hf item: { hf_gtp_apn, { "APN", "gtp.apn", FT_STRING, BASE_NONE, NULL, 0, "Access Point Name", HFILL }

[Wireshark-dev] Patch to packet-tcp.h

2006-09-08 Thread Peter Johansson
Hi, the attached patch adds a missing inlude to packet-tcp.h / Regards, Peter Index: C:/wireshark-win32-libs/epan/dissectors/packet-tcp.h === --- C:/wireshark-win32-libs/epan/dissectors/packet-tcp.h(revision 19161) +++

Re: [Wireshark-dev] win32: nmake setup: can't find cl

2006-09-08 Thread Cook, Timothy
Good deal. I was a little surprised that you were having trouble, since I have seen email from you about as long as I've been subscribed. I've tried copying the CYGWIN setup from one machine to another (doesn't work!). Had to reinstall CYGWIN! -Tim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

Re: [Wireshark-dev] question about RTP Streams - [ SPAM - Bayesian] Bayesian Filter detected spam

2006-09-08 Thread Andreina Toro
HiMiha, now I understand whyonly analyzing RTP streams I can`t get the information I need. Thank you to all for your time.. it´s amaizing your dedication and good will helping me!.. Regards, Andreina (a venezuelan student) On 9/7/06, Miha Jemec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: looking at the

Re: [Wireshark-dev] question about RTP Streams - [ SPAM - Bayesian] Bayesian Filter detected spam

2006-09-08 Thread ronnie sahlberg
while you can not find the end to end latency between the peers A and B by looking at RTP traffic there may be other ways to measure it. IF the analyzer is somewhere on the path between A and B and IF you can also find TCP sessions for both A and B in the trace you can : Measure the time