Re: [Wireshark-dev] patch to eyesdn wiretap module

2006-09-29 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, No wories. I still think it's good to have sanity checks (You do _not_ want to get involved in corrupt capture files), but they should not hinder developement. So what I've done is open up the channel space from 128 up, which covers the cases seen so far and hopefully future stuff. Thanx,

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Patch for NEMO

2006-09-29 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, Isn't this also true for ACOA? 8- #define MIP6_ACOA_LEN16 #define MIP6_ACOA_ACOA_OFF2 #define MIP6_ACOA_ACOA_LEN 16 8- Thanx, Jaap On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Nicolas DICHTEL wrote: Hi, please find enclosed a patch about Mobile Network Prefix option in NEMO.

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Patch for NEMO

2006-09-29 Thread Nicolas DICHTEL
No, because ACOA doesn't contain a field for prefix length. See RFC 3775 Section 6.2.5. Regards, Nicolas Le 29.09.2006 16:57, Jaap Keuter a écrit : Hi, Isn't this also true for ACOA? 8- #define MIP6_ACOA_LEN16 #define MIP6_ACOA_ACOA_OFF2 #define MIP6_ACOA_ACOA_LEN

Re: [Wireshark-dev] packet-ssl bug(s)?

2006-09-29 Thread Maynard, Chris
I submitted this about a month ago. Did it slip through the cracks? http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200608/msg00763.html Regards, Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Maynard, Chris Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 1:19 AM

[Wireshark-dev] [Patch] Change to preferences dialog title

2006-09-29 Thread Stephen Fisher
Attached is a patch for consideration that changes the title in the preferences notebook to be the full description of the preference (but leaves the short name in the preferences list on the left). Current: +- EXEC -- | New: +- Remote Process Execution |

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Patch] Change to preferences dialog title

2006-09-29 Thread Ulf Lamping
Stephen Fisher wrote: Attached is a patch for consideration that changes the title in the preferences notebook to be the full description of the preference (but leaves the short name in the preferences list on the left). Checked in. Looking nice :-) Regards, ULFL

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Possible bug with check_col?

2006-09-29 Thread Brian Vandenberg
IIRC there's a call to col_set_writable(.., FALSE) somewhere in dissector-http.c Thanks for the tip, I had figured out that it wasn't writable, but I hadn't [yet] found where it was being set to not writable. I'm slowly narrowing in on this, so hopefully I'll know what's causing this

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Possible bug with check_col?

2006-09-29 Thread Brian Vandenberg
I've written a bug up on this (bug #1132). I believe the culprit is a combination of the SSL dissector and the http dissector. -Brian Brian Vandenberg wrote: IIRC there's a call to col_set_writable(.., FALSE) somewhere in dissector-http.c Thanks for the tip, I had figured out