Hi,
I'm all for that. I personally don't like extending Wireshark into the
realm of trace file analyser.
Thanx,
Jaap
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Kukosa, Tomas wrote:
Hello,
I use a little bit differen solution for a similar problem.
Sometimes I need to dissect proprietray protocols from
Ulf Lamping wrote:
I let cygwin do its default thing, plus adding in the additional
downloads required for the Wireshark documentation. Then I went back to
an earlier version of Bash. I only installed cygwin to get Wireshark
working so it should be standard.
The file system is NTFS.
Hi!
Hello,
Peter hit the nail on the head, it's the Windows PATH variable.
The cygwin installation does not set an environment variable to allow
python to be found. Also all the stuff that accumulates in the PATH
environment variable can confuse things, though I don't think the length
is important.
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Robert Trybis wrote:
Hello,
Peter hit the nail on the head, it's the Windows PATH variable.
The cygwin installation does not set an environment variable to allow
python to be found. Also all the stuff that accumulates in the PATH
environment variable can confuse things,
Can anybody tell me how to undo everything that has been done by
Nmake -f Makefile.nmake all
?
Go back to the beginning, like so
nmake -f Makefile.nmake distclean
then build again
nmake -f Makefile.nmake all
I did the clean as above then tried to build again it failed :-(
The
Hi everyone, I have a question, I´ve being told that wireshark has an option that shows the Quality of Sevice of each call, but not in the RTP Stream´s Window. I mean, somewhere in a protocol´s data or protocol´s header.
My problem is that I´m doing my measures in a specific point of the trace
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 09:52:26AM +0100, Jaap Keuter wrote:
I'm all for that. I personally don't like extending Wireshark into the
realm of trace file analyser.
Actually adding new file formats is quite ok, as long as there is some
real use for it for more than just a handful of users. Also,
I have tried again after deleting the wireshark directory and getting a
clean copy of 00.99.4. Under XP the build ends prematurely with the
lines given below.
Any ideas why these files appear to be missing and how to work round it?
I did not go through the process of doing the automated library
Steve,
This patch (r19733) breaks the dissection of X.400 and X.500
protocols, and probably other things besides. I think that the
heuristic is incorrect.
Oops, sorry about that. Do you know where I can get a copy of the
standard so I can fix the heuristic in a better way?
No problem.
Robert Trybis wrote:
I have tried again after deleting the wireshark directory and getting a
clean copy of 00.99.4. Under XP the build ends prematurely with the
lines given below.
Both files should be copied by epan\Makefile.nmake:
mkstemp.c: ..\mkstemp.c
xcopy ..\mkstemp.c . /d
I
Hi List!
Someone may have a look?
Regards, ULFL
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
This patch adds support for correct computation of
variable length DCCP checksums as specified in
RFC 4340, section 9.
Previously wireshark was unable to compute these
checksums, only full-coverage checksums could be
validated.
This patch
* makes checksum computation dependent
is xcopy in the PATH?
On the command line type xcopy.
The PATH to add on WinXP might be C:\WINNT\system32\ instead of
C:\Windows\system32\
Lars
Robert Trybis wrote:
I am in C:\Program Files\wireshark which is where I installed the
sources using SVN and I am using the commands you mentioned;
I think you need to look further back into the nmake output. You should
see this:
--
cd ..
..\tools\lemon\lemon t=..\tools\lemon\lempar.c dtd_grammar.lemon
flex -odtd_parse.c dtd_parse.l
flex
Hi,
It's only now that I see it
Robert Trybis wrote:
I am in C:\Program Files\wireshark which is where I installed the
sources using SVN and I am using the commands you mentioned;
You've actually put the sources where the installation is going to be?
For one that is considered poor style
yes.
we used to have 2 threads in the old ethereal for a short period.
one thread for the main application and a second thread that was
dedicated to only update/redraw teh statistics taps once every few
seconds.
this did cause a quite significant degradation in performance/speed of
ethereal
However I believe that what Gerald is talking about is using threads
for asyncronously executing upgrades.
I do not think that the very linking to the thread libraries causes
performance degradation.
If on a single processor you must continiuously switch contexts
between the main thread and the
Hi,
I copied what seems to have been done in the binary distribution.
Anyway just to check things I moved everything to
C:\wireshark_source_00_99_4(no spaces in path)
and tried another build, but I got exactly the same result with
mkstemp.c strptime.c not being found.
Regards
RT
Bill,
Here is what I got in the build output;
cd ..
..\tools\lemon\lemon t=..\tools\lemon\lempar.c dtd_grammar.lemon
flex -odtd_parse.c dtd_parse.l
flex -odtd_preparse.c dtd_preparse.l
flex radius_dict.l
xcopy ..\mkstemp.c . /d
xcopy
The cd.. will make epan would working directory. So it copies the
mkstemp.c and strptime.c files from the root directory to the epan
directory. (Odd but it does not copy the header file) I confimed this
by deleting the files in epan, and the script copied them again.
So, by deduction, it seems
Hmmm, I don't understand both.
Joerg Mayer wrote:
gtkvumeter.c:946: warning: comparison of unsigned expression 0 is
always false
CLAMP is called with three variables of type GtkVUMeterScaling
gtkvumeter.c:1144: warning: comparison of unsigned expression 0 is
always false
CLAMP is
That's correct. Checking for updates would be pretty easy if we could
connect to the server, issue a request, and feed the response to
read_prefs_file(). It'd be even easier if we could do so from a thread
instead of a separate process.
In regard to Ulf's comment about threads not working
Hi I am trying to test my code in the wiretap directory.When I run tethereal on my binary file it crashes randomly.The core points here--
Loaded symbols for /lib/libresolv.so.2#00x0038fbfd in
Gerald Combs wrote:
That's correct. Checking for updates would be pretty easy if we could
connect to the server, issue a request, and feed the response to
read_prefs_file(). It'd be even easier if we could do so from a thread
instead of a separate process.
And probably less memory
LEGO wrote:
what about #defining them so they trigger an error?
Although this would be a nice solution, I don't see a way to do this -
it will conflict with the existing function declarations IMHO.
I would be more than glad if we could do it that simple ...
Regards, ULFL
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 11:07:15PM +0100, Ulf Lamping wrote:
Joerg Mayer wrote:
gtkvumeter.c:946: warning: comparison of unsigned expression 0 is
always false
CLAMP is called with three variables of type GtkVUMeterScaling
gtkvumeter.c:1144: warning: comparison of unsigned expression
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 04:48:58PM -0800, Stephen Fisher wrote:
One way that you can fix the warning is by manually assigning numbers
to the enumerated values in gtkvumeter.h:
A cleaner fix would be to just reverse the parameter order:
CLAMP (scaling, GTK_VUMETER_SCALING_LINEAR,
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 04:59:56PM -0800, Stephen Fisher wrote:
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 04:48:58PM -0800, Stephen Fisher wrote:
One way that you can fix the warning is by manually assigning numbers
to the enumerated values in gtkvumeter.h:
A cleaner fix would be to just reverse the
Hi
I have a question about wth-frame_buffer. Does the plugin library
(i.e the code that I am writing) have to initialize this buffer or is
it done by wireshark internally. in what case will this buffer be
empty. Currently my program is crashing becase the frame buffer is not
initialized properly
I try this out as well. Thank you. On 11/7/06, Kukosa, Tomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,I use a little bit differen solution for a similar problem.Sometimes I need to dissect proprietray protocols from tracesfiles not
supported by Wireshark.I use following way:1) convert trace file to pcap
Hi List!
I've added a proposal for an automatic update functionality to the Wiki.
Please comment!
Regards, ULFL
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
31 matches
Mail list logo
