Re: [Wireshark-dev] Patch for bug 1377 that produces a modal dialog with garbage

2007-03-30 Thread Peter Johansson
2007/3/30, Jeff Morriss [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Peter Johansson wrote: I compiled Wireshark with HAVE_AIRPDCAP by mistake (since I do not have AirPcap). This leads to a runtime problem however. When choosing options from the Capture interfaces dialog, I receive a modal dialogue

[Wireshark-dev] Filter does not work on current svn version

2007-03-30 Thread Anders Broman (AL/EAB)
Hi, Applying a filter in the current build results in: 13:13:01 Err Per-packet memory corrupted. Press any key to exit Best regards Anders ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Filter does not work on current svn version

2007-03-30 Thread Sebastien Tandel
Hi, I modified dfilter-macro for a strict aliasing gcc warning which stopped the compilation when using -Werror. I replaced (void**) by (void*) I had no problem on my debian but it seems you do. Sorry. Can you tell me on which platform and compiler it occured? I reverted back these fixes on

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Filter does not work on current svn version

2007-03-30 Thread Anders Broman (AL/EAB)
Hi, Hmm the problem seems to actually be in the H.263 dissector... Best regards Anders -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sebastien Tandel Sent: den 30 mars 2007 14:08 To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev]

[Wireshark-dev] Regarding Downloading through wget

2007-03-30 Thread Manjunath P
Hi all, nmake -f Makefile.nmake setup is not working for me. All the steps prio to this are correct as I hv verified it through verify_tools option. wget is not working for me.

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 0.99.5 make rpm-package problems onRHEL3

2007-03-30 Thread Maynard, Chris
Ah, I guess that explains it. Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 is equipped with gtk2-2.2.4-19 (and gtk+-1.2.10-31). Is gtk 2.4 or higher a requirement for building a Wireshark rpm? I did not see any mention of any minimum 2.x requirement in the README.developer, README.linux or any other README*

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Regarding Downloading through wget

2007-03-30 Thread Mark Lewis
You probably need to setup wget to see through your proxy. You can find your proxy details in your browsers connections settings. You set the proxy for wget under cygwin by adding a file into your cygwin ~ directory, which maps to c:\Documents and Settings\username The file is called .wgetrc and

Re: [Wireshark-dev] WIN32 Compilation failed : tshark is not a validwin32 application

2007-03-30 Thread CANDIA, Fabrice
The nmake used is C:\Program Files\Microsoft Platform SDK for Windows Server 2003 R2\Bin and not the directory mentioned in the developper's guide (Visual studio dir). Is it normal ? Developper's guide : Checking for required applications: cl: /cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft Visual

Re: [Wireshark-dev] WIN32 Compilation failed : tshark is not a validwin32 application

2007-03-30 Thread Graham Bloice
CANDIA, Fabrice wrote: The nmake used is C:\Program Files\Microsoft Platform SDK for Windows Server 2003 R2\Bin and not the directory mentioned in the developper's guide (Visual studio dir). Is it normal ? The paths shown in the dev guide are for information only and refer to a VC 6.0

Re: [Wireshark-dev] WIN32 Compilation failed : tshark is not a validwin32 application

2007-03-30 Thread CANDIA, Fabrice
So someone has already built Wireshark 0.99.5 under Windows 2000 ? Why tshark and other bin do not work ? -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Graham Bloice Envoyé : vendredi 30 mars 2007 17:03 À : Developer support list for Wireshark Objet :

Re: [Wireshark-dev] WIN32 Compilation failed : tshark is not a validwin32 application

2007-03-30 Thread Graham Bloice
CANDIA, Fabrice wrote: So someone has already built Wireshark 0.99.5 under Windows 2000 ? Why tshark and other bin do not work ? I think you're confusing the version of VC and the OS. I build it using VC 6.0 on XP, the same as the buildbot and have previously built on W2K, but not for a

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 0.99.5 make rpm-package problemsonRHEL3

2007-03-30 Thread Maynard, Chris
In an attempt to circumvent this problem I tried to disable gtk2. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to work. I still get the same undefined reference as before. But if 'gtk_text_buffer_select_range' is applicable for 2.4+ only and I've disabled gtk2, then why is it still trying to call it?

Re: [Wireshark-dev] WIN32 Compilation failed : tshark is not a validwin32 application

2007-03-30 Thread Ulf Lamping
Graham Bloice wrote: CANDIA, Fabrice wrote: The nmake used is C:\Program Files\Microsoft Platform SDK for Windows Server 2003 R2\Bin and not the directory mentioned in the developper's guide (Visual studio dir). Is it normal ? The paths shown in the dev guide are for information

[Wireshark-dev] Is it possible to write a dissector for an asymmetrical protocol?

2007-03-30 Thread Bob Doolittle
Hi, I'm writing my first protocol dissector (a plugin). I have the basics up and running. However, this protocol has a couple of unique issues: 1 Although encapsulated in UDP, it doesn't use a well-known port. I'm OK with telling wireshark to decode using the protocol specifically

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 0.99.5 make rpm-package problemsonRHEL3

2007-03-30 Thread Charles Lepple
On 3/30/07, Maynard, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In an attempt to circumvent this problem I tried to disable gtk2. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to work. I still get the same undefined reference as before. But if 'gtk_text_buffer_select_range' is applicable for 2.4+ only and I've

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 0.99.5 make rpm-package problems onRHEL3

2007-03-30 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 08:23:08PM +0200, Ulf Lamping wrote: You may try GTK 1.2 which should still work. Don't ask me how to do (configure) this, I'm currently Win32 only ;-) ./configure --disable-gtk2 :) Steve ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is it possible to write a dissector for an asymmetrical protocol?

2007-03-30 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 02:47:50PM -0700, Stephen Fisher wrote: Yes, but the problem with using Decode As is that it assigns that port to your protocol bi-directionally. The dissector then can't tell the difference in the sender and receiver. Also the Decode As settings aren't saved

Re: [Wireshark-dev] FYI: Native Mac OS X port of GTK+ on the horizon ...

2007-03-30 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 03:28:09AM +0200, Ulf Lamping wrote: Just stumbled over Gtk+ for Mac OS X: http://developer.imendio.com/projects/gtk-macosx which is a native port of GTK+ - so you won't need an X server. The screenshots suggests to be aimed towards bringing a native The Gimp to