At least from my location (UK) www.wireshark.org seems to be down. A
traceroute shows the path running through telia in London so is this
damage due to the telia\cogent dispute
(http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/03/19/1912211)?
I also see that someone has nabbed wireshark.com for
Everything goes well from Germany!
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 2:17 AM, Graham Bloice [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
At least from my location (UK) www.wireshark.org seems to be down. A
traceroute shows the path running through telia in London so is this
damage due to the telia\cogent dispute
The main Wireshark page reports that there was a server outage from
10:00am - 11:30am PDT due to a hardware failure. The site is back up
though and all is well in the USA ... well as far as Wireshark is
concerned at least.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The server was down for about 80 minutes earlier this morning. According to our
hosting provider, there was a problem with the disk array.
Barco You wrote:
Everything goes well from Germany!
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 2:17 AM, Graham Bloice
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way to make use of unnamed structs a compilation error?
--
There's no point in being grown up if you can't be childish sometimes.
-- Dr. Who
Index: epan/dissectors/packet-ieee802154.h
===
---
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 03:01:47PM +1100, Andrew Hood wrote:
Is there any way to make use of unnamed structs a compilation error?
Not with gcc from what I can find so far.
+#define dst_addr16 dst_addr.dst_addr16
+#define dst_addr64 dst_addr.dst_addr64
+#define src_addr16 src_addr.src_addr16
