[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86

2008-04-20 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-XP-x86 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/Windows-XP-x86/builds/4256 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-xp-x86 Build Reason: Build

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New Wireshark welcome page!

2008-04-20 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:20:31PM -0600, Stephen Fisher wrote: The Widget settings I've chosen are for a min. resolution of 1024*768, before scrollbars appear (well, slightly less about 1000*700 or so, so there's some space left for things like a startmenu). Sounds reasonable. I'm

[Wireshark-dev] plugin dll - couldn't load module

2008-04-20 Thread Pernd Biepers
Hello, I want to write a plugin dll for wireshark. Therefore I have compiled wireshark under XP like described in your developer guide. (it is not so easy, did any one ever think about a script language for dissectors, or is there a way to build plugins without the complete wireshark ?) So,

Re: [Wireshark-dev] plugin dll - couldn't load module

2008-04-20 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, Pernd Biepers wrote: Hello, I want to write a plugin dll for wireshark. Therefore I have compiled wireshark under XP like described in your developer guide. (it is not so easy, No, it's not. That's why the developer guide is written. did any one ever think about a script language

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New Wireshark welcome page!

2008-04-20 Thread Ulf Lamping
Joerg Mayer schrieb: On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:20:31PM -0600, Stephen Fisher wrote: The Widget settings I've chosen are for a min. resolution of 1024*768, before scrollbars appear (well, slightly less about 1000*700 or so, so there's some space left for things like a startmenu).

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New Wireshark welcome page!

2008-04-20 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:40:36AM +0200, Ulf Lamping wrote: Joerg Mayer schrieb: On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:20:31PM -0600, Stephen Fisher wrote: The Widget settings I've chosen are for a min. resolution of 1024*768, before scrollbars appear (well, slightly less about 1000*700 or so,

[Wireshark-dev] Should we support GTK+ 2.0[.x] and 2.2[.x], or just 2.4 and later?

2008-04-20 Thread Guy Harris
The SVN trunk of Wireshark has had the GTK+ 1.2[.x]/GLib 1.2[.x] support removed. There's still code in there that checks for GTK+ releases prior to 2.4; however: 1) I checked in a fix to the configure script and to gtk/file_dlg.c that prevented Wireshark from compiling on GTK+

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Should we support GTK+ 2.0[.x] and 2.2[.x], or just 2.4 and later?

2008-04-20 Thread Ulf Lamping
Guy Harris schrieb: The SVN trunk of Wireshark has had the GTK+ 1.2[.x]/GLib 1.2[.x] support removed. There's still code in there that checks for GTK+ releases prior to 2.4; however: 1) I checked in a fix to the configure script and to gtk/file_dlg.c that prevented Wireshark from