hi,
im unable to modify dissect_rrc_OCTET_STRING()nbsp; function in packet-rrc..c
, compiling after changing the rrc.cnf using nbsp;#.HDR or #.FTR is not
getting reflected for this function, which ive used successfully to modify
other asn genereted disssector functions. can anyone plz
Hi,
which OCTET STRING type do you need to modify?
It is not possibe to modify common OCTET STRING.
You can use #.FN_HDR/BODY/FTR e.g. in following way:
NAS-Message ::= OCTET STRING (SIZE (1..4095))
#.FN_HDR NAS-Message
...
or e.g.
RAB-Info-v6b0ext ::=SEQUENCE {
Hi,
I had a tshark built on version 0.99.6.
My system mets serious crashes while running tshark using display filters
and goes to *KGDB.* (crash is not consistent though, this time it was 4th
crash). I couldn't get any core as system went to KGDB mode.
Please let me know if it's known issue.
Hi.
I'm not sure what you're trying to do but look at:
InformationElements.asn:
NAS-Message ::= OCTET STRING (SIZE (1..4095))
in .cnf
#.FN_BODY NAS-Message VAL_PTR = nas_message_tvb
tvbuff_t *nas_message_tvb=NULL;
%(DEFAULT_BODY)s
if (nas_message_tvb)
You probaly want:
#.FN_HDR TargetRNC-ToSourceRNC-Container/dL-DCCHmessage
Regards
Anders
prakash chowbey wrote:
hi tomas,
thanks for your reply
i m stating what i want to do.
in packet-rrc.c we have
static const per_choice_t TargetRNC_ToSourceRNC_Container_choice[] = {
{ 0,
Hi all.
The ms-mms dissector is returning -1 in some cases where it seems to
want more data.
The attached capture has no ms-mms data, and end up with a UDP packet
not showing any Data.
Shouldn't the ms-mms dissector return 0 or something?
--
Stig Bjørlykke
udp-pmul.pcap
Description: Binary
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Stig Bjørlykke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
The ms-mms dissector is returning -1 in some cases where it seems to
want more data.
The attached capture has no ms-mms data, and end up with a UDP packet
not showing any Data.
Shouldn't the ms-mms dissector
Hi all,
This time (5th time) system crashed without any filter option, so its not a
filter issue.
No core as system goes to kgdb.
Regds,
Moheed
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Moheed Moheed Ahmad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I had a tshark built on version 0.99.6.
My system mets serious
Hello,
As someone told me, I should have my ged125 dissector be called by the
TCP dissector. How do I go about doing this?
Thanks,
Martin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guy Harris
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:11 PM
To: Developer
dissector_add(tcp.port, portnumber, protocol_handle);
It should be an example dissector in the README.developer that has this
information.
/Tobias
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Corraine
(mcorrain)
Sent: den 11 juni 2008 16:45
Moheed Moheed Ahmad wrote:
Hi all,
This time (5th time) system crashed without any filter option, so its
not a filter issue.
No core as system goes to kgdb.
What's kgdb? This sounds more like an issue with your system rather than
tshark.
___
Moheed Moheed Ahmad wrote:
My system mets serious crashes while running tshark using display
filters and goes to *KGDB.*
Then there's probably a bug either in the kernel or in some kernel
loadable module. I'd suggest reporting this to MontaVista.
It's possible, but *EXTREMELY* unlikely,
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Stig Bjørlykke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 11. juni. 2008, at 16.22, Martin Mathieson wrote:
Section 2.7.2 of README.developer suggests that it should return 0,
since that's how many bytes it has dissected.
It also shouldn't be setting desegment_len to
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Solaris-10-SPARC on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Solaris-10-SPARC/builds/94
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: solaris-10-sparc
Build
Hi,
Sorry for the noise.
Yes, the issue was with kernel in packet_recvmsg.
Found and fixed.
Thanks,
Moheed
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Richard van der Hoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Moheed Moheed Ahmad wrote:
Hi all,
This time (5th time) system crashed without any filter option,
15 matches
Mail list logo
