[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-ppc

2008-11-14 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-ppc on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-ppc/builds/0 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-ppc Build Reason: Build

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (release) on OSX-10.5-ppc

2008-11-14 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-ppc on Wireshark (release). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/release/builders/OSX-10.5-ppc/builds/0 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/release/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-ppc Build Reason: Build

[Wireshark-dev] Ericsson SCAP Diameter

2008-11-14 Thread Abhik Sarkar
Hello All, I am currently deploying/integrating a system which interfaces with Ericsson charging systems using Diameter SCAP. During the integration, I found that Wireshark is not able to decode some SCAP AVPs and was able to modify the Wireshark Diameter Ericsson dictionary to decode all the

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Ericsson SCAP Diameter

2008-11-14 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, I've no idea about the leagal issues but I'd be careful if you where able to create that dictionary by Using Ericsson internal dockumentation or dockuments that may have been given to you under nondisclosure terms. Regards Anders -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Ericsson SCAP Diameter

2008-11-14 Thread Abhik Sarkar
Hi Anders, Thanks for the quick response. This is the reason why I asked... I am not sure about the document's distribution because it was provided to us by Ericsson but it doesn't seem to say anything about an NDA and says in general that it is for application developers intending to interface

[Wireshark-dev] regarding memory failure in wireshark

2008-11-14 Thread prashanth joshi
Hi all,   When i run the wireshark for some time to capture live traffic the wireshark runs out of memory. Is it possible to configure wireshark so as to allocate more memory for the buffers? Is there any tool that supports catpuring packets for more memory than the  wireshark?   Regards,

Re: [Wireshark-dev] regarding memory failure in wireshark

2008-11-14 Thread Speck, Michael
Hi Prashanth, AFAIK, Wireshark uses as much memory as it could allocate by your systems. The longer Wireshark runs the more memory is used. There are several solutions: First, you could install more RAM to your PC and/or increase the size of virtual (swap) memory. A second option is to use

Re: [Wireshark-dev] regarding memory failure in wireshark

2008-11-14 Thread Sake Blok
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 02:21:06PM +0100, Speck, Michael wrote: Hi Prashanth, AFAIK, Wireshark uses as much memory as it could allocate by your systems. The longer Wireshark runs the more memory is used. There are several solutions: First, you could install more RAM to your PC and/or

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Debugging WireShark / Visual 2008 / XP

2008-11-14 Thread Bill Meier
Pat Saunders wrote: Hi, I am using Microsoft Visual 2008 : winXP I have added a small plug-in but when I start Wireshark.exe it crashes with a fault address in libwireshark.dll. I am 75% sure this is due to my plug-in (When I take my plug-in

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Ubuntu-7.10-x86-64

2008-11-14 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Ubuntu-7.10-x86-64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Ubuntu-7.10-x86-64/builds/419 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: ubuntu-7.10-x86

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-x86

2008-11-14 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-x86 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-x86/builds/1190 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-x86 Build Reason:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Debugging WireShark / Visual 2008 / XP

2008-11-14 Thread Pat Saunders
Thanks - I have familiarised myself wirh step into etc How I do debug a process at startup - I know I have to attach to the wireshark process at startup - but if it crashes at startup : how do I debug at startup ?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Debugging WireShark / Visual 2008 / XP

2008-11-14 Thread Bill Meier
Pat Saunders wrote: Thanks - I have familiarised myself wirh step into etc How I do debug a process at startup - I know I have to attach to the wireshark process at startup - but if it crashes at startup : how do I debug at startup ?? Actually, you should start the process from VS (as

Re: [Wireshark-dev] configure.in:1562 missing plugins/Custom.m4

2008-11-14 Thread Guy Harris
On Nov 14, 2008, at 7:06 PM, Michael A. McCartney wrote: ./autogen.sh would not work at first saying that autoconf had to be 2.60 or later. That's true - we use features that were not present (or didn't work) in earlier versions. So I had to grab and install autoconf-2.63 and m4-1.4.12

Re: [Wireshark-dev] configure.in:1562 missing plugins/Custom.m4

2008-11-14 Thread Michael A. McCartney
Although the sinclude issue went away, it seems I may have misconfigured automake.. epan/Makefile.am:45: Libtool library used but `LIBTOOL' is undefined epan/Makefile.am:45: The usual way to define `LIBTOOL' is to add `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' epan/Makefile.am:45: to `configure.in' and run `aclocal'

Re: [Wireshark-dev] configure.in:1562 missing plugins/Custom.m4

2008-11-14 Thread Guy Harris
On Nov 14, 2008, at 7:51 PM, Michael A. McCartney wrote: Although the sinclude issue went away, it seems I may have misconfigured automake.. epan/Makefile.am:45: Libtool library used but `LIBTOOL' is undefined epan/Makefile.am:45: The usual way to define `LIBTOOL' is to add

Re: [Wireshark-dev] configure.in:1562 missing plugins/Custom.m4

2008-11-14 Thread Michael A. McCartney
ok thanks for the advice - will try that later. Guy Harris wrote: On Nov 14, 2008, at 7:51 PM, Michael A. McCartney wrote: Although the sinclude issue went away, it seems I may have misconfigured automake.. epan/Makefile.am:45: Libtool library used but `LIBTOOL' is undefined