Re: [Wireshark-dev] Supported GTK versions [Was:rev 28690]

On Jun 11, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote: > I know we had this discussion only recently, but do we really want to > support platforms with an ancient version of gtk for the upcoming 1.2 > and/or 1.3 branches of Wireshark? What is the gtk-developers position > on supporting such old versions

[Wireshark-dev] Supported GTK versions [Was:rev 28690]

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:03:46PM +, s...@wireshark.org wrote: > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=28690 > > User: stig > Date: 2009/06/10 03:03 PM > > Log: > Make it compile with gtk < 2.6. I know we had this discussion only recently, but do we really want t

[Wireshark-dev] compile using libwireshark.dll

Hello, I noticed that actual release versions of wireshark that can be downloaded online do not include a libwireshark.lib file, but they do include a libwireshark.dll. Does this mean that the only possible way to compile a wireshark plugin is by compiling all of wireshark source first? Or

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Enhancement to Flow graph in Wireshark

Hi, Le jeudi 11 juin 2009 à 16:24 +0530, BANDARU, Govindarao (Govindarao) a écrit : > Didier, > Thanks a lot for quick response. I will give a try now. > Where I can see text output of flow graph? Please let me know. Huh? Are we speaking about the same thing? Here both in 1.0 and HEAD in t

Re: [Wireshark-dev] My first Dissector-Plugin

Hi, Also have a look at doc/README.plugin to see what you need to do to incorporate your dissector into the build. Thanx, Jaap yami wrote: > Hi, > > I think the plug-in profinet (under plugins/profinet) is a good and > simple example for your reference. > Just grep profinet in Makefile.am, co

Re: [Wireshark-dev] My first Dissector-Plugin

Hi, I think the plug-in profinet (under plugins/profinet) is a good and simple example for your reference. Just grep profinet in Makefile.am, configure.in etc. will give your some useful info. (Once upon a time, agentx is a simple example too, but unfortunately it has been moved out of plug-ins.

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Enhancement to Flow graph in Wireshark

Didier, Thanks a lot for quick response. I will give a try now. Where I can see text output of flow graph? Please let me know. Thanks, Govind -Original Message- From: didier [mailto:dgauthe...@magic.fr] Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 9:00 PM To: Developer support list for Wiresha

[Wireshark-dev] My first Dissector-Plugin

Hello, I'm try to write my first dissector plugin for wireshark. To start I read the chapter 9.2 and 9.2.1 in the developer's guide. Now I has this files in my plugin dir: |-- Makefile.am |-- Makefile.common |-- Makefile.in |-- Makefile.nmake |-- moduleinfo.h |-- moduleinfo.nmake |-- packet-dpne

[Wireshark-dev] ChmodBPF problem - Fixed!

On my Mac, I noticed that the ChmodBPF script didn't seem to have any effect on the permissions of my /dev/bpf files. After reading through the script, I realized that the function declaration and the later function call differed in name The function is defined by the name StartService() ,

Re: [Wireshark-dev] GTP extension headers for TPDU

Hi, If I remember correctly the header dissection in gtp is a bit iffy and could do with a rewrite if some one has the time... On the other hand there is no bug reports about the dissection... Regards Anders -Original Message- From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-de

Re: [Wireshark-dev] advantages given by Wireshark 1.2.0pre2

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 9:29 AM, SOLTANI FATEN wrote: > Someone can give me what are the advantages given by Wireshark > 1.2.0pre2? Did you read the release notes? http://www.wireshark.org/docs/relnotes/wireshark-1.2.0.html -- Stig Bjørlykke

[Wireshark-dev] advantages given by Wireshark 1.2.0pre2

Hi Someone can give me what are the advantages given by Wireshark 1.2.0pre2? Thanks in advance ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wiresha