[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-x86

The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-x86 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-x86/builds/2961 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-x86 Build Reason:

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-ppc

The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-ppc on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-ppc/builds/1613 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-ppc Build Reason:

[Wireshark-dev] 802.11k

Hi, I would like to develop a dissector for 802.11k protocol. I need to know whether it is already implemented or is somebody working on it now? Thanks, Soumya ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list

Re: [Wireshark-dev] 802.11k

Hi, packet-ieee80211.c should already have at least some 802.11k support http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-commits/200704/msg00121.html if something is missing/wrong you should fix it there. Regards Anders From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-Win64

The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-XP-Win64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-XP-Win64/builds/961 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-xp-win64 Build

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 29156: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-bacapp.c packet-bacapp.h

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:35 AM, etx...@wireshark.org wrote: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=29156 Log: size_t - int to make the Win64 build bot happy. cc1: warnings being treated as errors packet-bacapp.c: In function 'fConvertXXXtoUTF8':

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-x86

The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-x86 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-x86/builds/2966 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-x86 Build Reason:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 29157: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-bacapp.c packet-bacapp.h

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:53 AM, g...@wireshark.org wrote: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=29157 Log: GLib documentation says the 3rd and 5th arguments to g_iconv are gsize *s. cc1: warnings being treated as errors packet-bacapp.c: In function

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-ppc

The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-ppc on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-ppc/builds/1616 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-ppc Build Reason:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] the feature of limiting packet size

On Jul 20, 2009, at 3:41 PM, Joshua (Shiwei) Zhao wrote: I believe it's a bug there, at least in 1.0.4 I'm using. I don't believe all packets have that big headers over 500 bytes. What matters is whether all the data dissected in the packet is bigger than the snapshot length; in an SMB

[Wireshark-dev] Missing diameter/eap.xml in 1.2.1?

Hi. When compiling 1.2.1 we get this warning: Could not open file: 'eap.xml', error: No such file or directory. Do we miss eap.xml or shall eap.xml be removed from dictionary.xml? -- Stig Bjørlykke ___ Sent via:

[Wireshark-dev] Need to if a packet is dissected for the first time

Hi all! Is there a possibility to distinguish if a packet is dissected for the first time (for example during a lifecapture) or if it is dissected because of marking it in the packet pane? Background: I want to trigger some actions when a packet is captured (or in other words: the first time it

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Need to if a packet is dissected for the first time

Hi, Le mardi 21 juillet 2009 à 16:57 +0200, Torsten Proch a écrit : Hi all! Is there a possibility to distinguish if a packet is dissected for the first time (for example during a lifecapture) or if it is dissected because of marking it in the packet pane? Background: I want to trigger some

[Wireshark-dev] Use of User DLT

Folks, I would like to use Wireshark to decode non-network data. To do this, I have created a wireshark plugin. Here are some snippets of the plugin: void proto_register_ldm(void) { module_t *module; if (proto_ldm == -1) { proto_ldm = proto_register_protocol ( Ldm

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Use of User DLT

On 21. juli. 2009, at 19.44, Mahesh K wrote: Now when I try to configure DLT User 0 in wireshark (Edit- Preferences-ProtocolsDLT_USER-Edit Encapsulations Table and adding an entry to decode DLT 147 using the ldm plugin) I get the following error No such proto:ldm. Now I do see that the

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Missing diameter/eap.xml in 1.2.1?

I have the same error message at execution time (tshark). Olivier Stig Bjørlykke a écrit : Hi. When compiling 1.2.1 we get this warning: Could not open file: 'eap.xml', error: No such file or directory. Do we miss eap.xml or shall eap.xml be removed from dictionary.xml? -- Stig

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Missing diameter/eap.xml in 1.2.1?

The problem probably is that for 1.2.1 diameter.xml got copied from trunk but not the changes to makefile.am and wireshark.nsi (http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=28849) There was also a change to packet-diameter.c but I think that may not needed. One solution is to

Re: [Wireshark-dev] the feature of limiting packet size

Guy, thank you very much for your help! I was using a version which was slightly modified by my colleague here. It turns out it's his change that caused this problem. Mystery solved :) Best, Joshua On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu wrote: On Jul 20, 2009, at 3:41

[Wireshark-dev] SIP-C/2.0

current version can't decode SIP-C/2.0, any idea about this issue? street _ Windows Live™ Hotmail®: Search, add, and share the web’s latest sports videos. Check it out.