Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 1.4 Cmake status

2010-05-19 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 08:35:33PM +0200, Stig Bj?rlykke wrote: On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de wrote: Maybe something went wrong with the current directory or the creation of AUTHORS-SHORT? Oh, it's because I have a generated AUTHORS-SHORT in the source

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 1.4 Cmake status - missing directory

2010-05-19 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 02:21:56AM +0100, Jose Pedro Oliveira wrote: But this is strange: ... without libz ... as ENABLE_ZLIB was ON. Same here: Compiled (32-bit) with GLib 2.22.4, with libpcap (version unknown), without libz, with POSIX capabilities (Linux), with libpcre 7.9, with SMI 0.4.5,

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 1.4 Cmake status - missing directory

2010-05-19 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 02:29:35PM +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote: I'll take care of it. Committed revision 32899. Ciao Joerg -- Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that

[Wireshark-dev] Is it just me? (build error in packet-q708.c)

2010-05-19 Thread Martin Mathieson
I don't understand why I need to patch below to build this dissector, whereas the buildbots seem to be fine. Index: epan/dissectors/packet-q708.c === --- epan/dissectors/packet-q708.c (revision 32881) +++

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is it just me? (build error in packet-q708.c)

2010-05-19 Thread Jakub Zawadzki
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 02:56:52PM +0100, Martin Mathieson wrote: { hf_q708_sanc, { Signalling Area Network Code (SANC),q708.sanc, - FT_UINT16, BASE_DEC | BASE_EXT_STRING, VALS(q708_sanc_areas_ext), 0x0, + FT_UINT16, BASE_DEC |

[Wireshark-dev] trunk-1.0 fails to compile on Windows with VS2008EE

2010-05-19 Thread Maynard, Chris
As the subject line indicates, trunk-1.0 fails to compile on Windows with VS2008EE. The error log is attached. - Chris CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email are confidential and for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you receive this email in error, please delete it

[Wireshark-dev] Extending Wireshark with Python deprecated?

2010-05-19 Thread Scott
This post is in reference to http://wiki.wireshark.org/Python. Using the 1.0.0 and 1.2.2 source I get the following warning: configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-python after running these two commands in Ubuntu 9.10: ./autogen.sh ./configure --with-python Is this not in the source

Re: [Wireshark-dev] trunk-1.0 fails to compile on Windows with VS2008EE

2010-05-19 Thread Pascal Quantin
Hi 2010/5/19 Maynard, Chris christopher.mayn...@gtech.com As the subject line indicates, trunk-1.0 fails to compile on Windows with VS2008EE. The error log is attached. VS2008EE compilation was added in wireshark 1.2. That's why. If really needed, you can try to backport the patchs

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Extending Wireshark with Python deprecated?

2010-05-19 Thread Jeff Morriss
Scott wrote: This post is in reference to http://wiki.wireshark.org/Python. Using the 1.0.0 and 1.2.2 source I get the following warning: configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-python after running these two commands in Ubuntu 9.10: ./autogen.sh ./configure --with-python Is

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Extending Wireshark with Python deprecated?

2010-05-19 Thread Scott
Ah. Thank you! On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Jeff Morriss jeff.morriss...@gmail.comwrote: Scott wrote: This post is in reference to http://wiki.wireshark.org/Python. Using the 1.0.0 and 1.2.2 source I get the following warning: configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-python

Re: [Wireshark-dev] trunk-1.0 fails to compile on Windows with VS2008EE

2010-05-19 Thread Maynard, Chris
Ah yes, thanks Pascal. It's been a really long since I've worked with the 1.0 branch and forgot. If I comment out HHC_DIR in config.nmake, it compiles successfully with VS6.0; otherwise the following error occurs: Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility Version 6.00.9782.0 Copyright (C)

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is it just me? (build error in packet-q708.c)

2010-05-19 Thread Jaap Keuter
On 05/19/2010 04:07 PM, Jakub Zawadzki wrote: On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 02:56:52PM +0100, Martin Mathieson wrote: {hf_q708_sanc, { Signalling Area Network Code (SANC),q708.sanc, - FT_UINT16, BASE_DEC | BASE_EXT_STRING, VALS(q708_sanc_areas_ext), 0x0, +

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is it just me? (build error in packet-q708.c)

2010-05-19 Thread Gerasimos Dimitriadis
Hi, I think that in this case there is no need for a conversion macro, since we are not dealing with arrays but with pointers to value_string_ext. By the way, are the VALS/TFS/RVALS casts necessary for certain compilers? Because I thought that arrays automatically decay to pointers when needed

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is it just me? (build error in packet-q708.c)

2010-05-19 Thread Guy Harris
On May 19, 2010, at 1:21 PM, Gerasimos Dimitriadis wrote: I think that in this case there is no need for a conversion macro, since we are not dealing with arrays but with pointers to value_string_ext. By the way, are the VALS/TFS/RVALS casts necessary for certain compilers? Because I

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RFE: Remove the old buildbot source tarballs from automated/src/

2010-05-19 Thread Jaap Keuter
On 05/19/2010 10:46 PM, Jose Pedro Oliveira wrote: Hi, Would it be possible to have the pre-1.3.6 source tarballs removed from http://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/src/ ? The directory listing is getting a bit too long. Thanks in advance, jpo Hi, Aren't you talking about removing

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 1.4 Cmake status - zlib

2010-05-19 Thread Jose Pedro Oliveira
Joerg, On 2010-05-19 14:06, Joerg Mayer wrote: On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 02:29:35PM +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote: I'll take care of it. Committed revision 32899. Thanks for the update. Output from tshark (built from wireshark-1.3.6-SVN-32899.tar.bz2): -- $ ./tshark -v TShark

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RFE: Remove the old buildbot source tarballsfrom automated/src/

2010-05-19 Thread Jose Pedro Oliveira
Jaap, On 2010-05-19 21:58, Jaap Keuter wrote: On 05/19/2010 10:46 PM, Jose Pedro Oliveira wrote: Hi, Would it be possible to have the pre-1.3.6 source tarballs removed from http://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/src/ ? The directory listing is getting a bit too long. Thanks in