On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:33:56 -0600, Stephen Fisher
st...@stephen-fisher.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 02:02:48PM +0200, Marcel Haas wrote:
i want to include the tvbuff.h to my code so i can make own tvbs
with tvbuff_t* my code lies at wireshark/epan so as tvbuff.h.
except.h:97:
(Paging LTE experts here)
On Oct 12, 2011, at 8:02 AM, wme...@wireshark.org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=39384
User: wmeier
Date: 2011/10/12 08:02 AM
Log:
Fix a benign bug: Use correct proto_tree_add_item() encoding arg.
At least as I read
On 10/12/2011 1:42 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
(Paging LTE experts here)
On Oct 12, 2011, at 8:02 AM, wme...@wireshark.org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=39384
User: wmeier
Date: 2011/10/12 08:02 AM
Log:
Fix a benign bug: Use correct
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
(Paging LTE experts here)
On Oct 12, 2011, at 8:02 AM, wme...@wireshark.org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=39384
User: wmeier
Date: 2011/10/12 08:02 AM
Log:
Fix a
Martin Mathieson skrev 2011-10-12 20:22:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu
mailto:g...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
(Paging LTE experts here)
On Oct 12, 2011, at 8:02 AM, wme...@wireshark.org
mailto:wme...@wireshark.org wrote:
On Oct 12, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Martin Mathieson wrote:
Guy, I'm sure to be missing something,
No, I am - I missed the offset++. Sorry about that. (I also missed the 0x40
mask in the hf[] item for hf_pdcp_lte_rohc_m.) New code is OK, old code was
definitely wrong.
On 10/12/2011 2:20 PM, Bill Meier wrote:
On 10/12/2011 1:42 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
(Paging LTE experts here)
On Oct 12, 2011, at 8:02 AM, wme...@wireshark.org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=39384
User: wmeier
Date: 2011/10/12 08:02 AM
Log:
Fix a
On 10/10/2011 2:44 PM, Bill Meier wrote:
For FT_STRING..., rather than cluttering up the encoding arg with
ENC_NA, I would be sightly inclined to specify endianness only where
relevant.
For FT_UINT_STRING obviously ENC_[BIG|LITTLE]_... would be needed for all.
However, I can understand the
On Oct 7, 2011, at 9:48 AM, Ed Beroset wrote:
Based on the current discussion about the use of the format field for
proto_tree_add_item(), I have once again revised the patch file for Bug 5531
( https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5531 ). It has gotten
a lot of votes and
On Oct 12, 2011, at 1:16 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
[...elided...] I *might* be inclined to go with ENC_ASCII as the first step
even though it'd require more changes (e.g., to protocols where the encoding
is UTF-8).
Or, to put it another way: going with ENC_ASCII is the conservative solution,
10 matches
Mail list logo
