On Jan 11, 2012, at 4:48 PM, Sam Roberts wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 05:00:57PM +, ger...@wireshark.org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=40436
User: gerald
Date: 2012/01/11
On Jan 12, 2012, at 1:35 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
On Jan 11, 2012, at 4:48 PM, Sam Roberts wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 05:00:57PM +, ger...@wireshark.org wrote:
-Original Message-
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-
boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Joerg Mayer
Sent: 12 January 2012 00:19
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at
On 01/11/2012 06:04 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
On 1/10/12 2:29 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
On 1/10/12 2:09 PM, Balint Reczey wrote:
diff --git a/debian/wireshark-common.files b/debian/wireshark-common.files
index 41341be..4403c04 100644
--- a/debian/wireshark-common.files
+++
On 01/11/2012 08:37 AM, Harper wrote:
Balint Reczeybalint.rec...@ericsson.com
wrote in news:4f09f7b3.2000...@ericsson.com:
Hi,
I have run tools/git-compare-abis.sh on latest master-1.6
(wireshark-1.6.4-21-ga6c3642).
The ABI is almost totally stable [1], which is very good sign for
plugin
On 1/12/12 1:59 AM, Balint Reczey wrote:
I'm not sure that it is the proper approach.
We don't have to update the library version if there is no change in the
lib.
The libtool documentation says If the library source code has changed
at all since the last update, then increment revision
On 1/12/12 9:06 AM, Gerald Combs wrote:
On 1/12/12 1:59 AM, Balint Reczey wrote:
I'm not sure that it is the proper approach.
We don't have to update the library version if there is no change in the
lib.
The libtool documentation says If the library source code has changed
at all since
On 01/12/2012 06:20 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
On 1/12/12 9:06 AM, Gerald Combs wrote:
On 1/12/12 1:59 AM, Balint Reczey wrote:
I'm not sure that it is the proper approach.
We don't have to update the library version if there is no change in the
lib.
The libtool documentation says If the
On 01/12/2012 06:06 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
On 1/12/12 1:59 AM, Balint Reczey wrote:
I'm not sure that it is the proper approach.
We don't have to update the library version if there is no change in the
lib.
The libtool documentation says If the library source code has changed
at all since
On 1/12/12 9:33 AM, Balint Reczey wrote:
On 01/12/2012 06:20 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
On 1/12/12 9:06 AM, Gerald Combs wrote:
On 1/12/12 1:59 AM, Balint Reczey wrote:
I'm not sure that it is the proper approach.
We don't have to update the library version if there is no change in
the
lib.
Why not mimic the Wireshark version? so instead of 1:6:0 use 1:6:4 for
wireshark
1.6.4? Would make it trivial to generate the library version number.
http://www.sourceware.org/autobook/autobook/autobook_91.html
Thanks for the pointer and the following explanations. Now that I feel I
On Jan 12, 2012, at 9:06 AM, Gerald Combs wrote:
Is ACC available for Windows or OS X? I'd rather keep make-version.pl
cross-platform if possible.
This:
http://forge.ispras.ru/projects/abi-compliance-checker/repository/entry/trunk/INSTALL.txt
seems to suggest that the latest
Thus wrote Chris Maynard (chris.mayn...@gtech.com):
To avoid the possibility of reading past the end of option_content in
the case when oh.option_length sizeof(option_content), I think it
would be safer to do this instead:
wblock-data.packet.opt_comment = g_strndup(option_content,
Of the developers attending FOSDEM, who can run fastest?
Original Message
Subject: [FOSDEM] Meeting rooms
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:08:17 +0100
From: Pascal Bleser l...@fosdem.org
To: fos...@lists.fosdem.org
This year, we will provide two meeting rooms (aka BoF rooms)
in the AW
On Jan 12, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
Thanks for the pointer and the following explanations. Now that I feel I *may*
have understood the numbering, I have a new proposal/question:
As we strive to keep our libs downward compatible inside a stable release
(i.e. the newer libs should
15 matches
Mail list logo
