Hi,
doc/README.developer says
Don't initialize variables in their declaration with non-constant
values. Not all compilers support this. E.g. don't use
guint32 i = somearray[2];
...
In file.c, read_packet(), we do
const struct wtap_pkthdr *phdr = wtap_phdr(cf-wth);
union
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Martin Kaiser li...@kaiser.cx wrote:
Hi,
doc/README.developer says
Don't initialize variables in their declaration with non-constant
values. Not all compilers support this. E.g. don't use
guint32 i = somearray[2];
...
In file.c, read_packet(), we do
Hi,
as part of #7729, we have to parse a text string that contains an IPv6
address and convert it into a sequence of bytes - and detect malformed
addresses.
The current proposal does the parsing manually. I was wondering if we
could simplify things by using getaddrinfo(). It seems that it's
On Oct 14, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Martin Kaiser li...@kaiser.cx wrote:
doc/README.developer says
Don't initialize variables in their declaration with non-constant
values. Not all compilers support this. E.g. don't use
guint32 i = somearray[2];
Actually, that should only apply to variables
On Oct 14, 2012, at 10:47 AM, Evan Huus eapa...@gmail.com wrote:
This is very similar in theme to my question about variadic macros a
few weeks ago [1].
...except that...
The conclusion there was that they're not
officially part of C89 which is Wireshark's official C version. Even
though
On Oct 14, 2012, at 10:50 AM, Martin Kaiser li...@kaiser.cx wrote:
as part of #7729, we have to parse a text string that contains an IPv6
address and convert it into a sequence of bytes - and detect malformed
addresses.
The current proposal does the parsing manually. I was wondering if we
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 02:02:53PM +, Anders Broman wrote:
Why not make a patch that developers can try out and start debugging?
Attached.
PS. I'd rather want to hear comments, rather than debugging...
diff --git a/epan/epan.c b/epan/epan.c
index 6437bad..6880005 100644
--- a/epan/epan.c
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Jakub Zawadzki
darkjames...@darkjames.plwrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 02:02:53PM +, Anders Broman wrote:
Why not make a patch that developers can try out and start debugging?
Attached.
PS. I'd rather want to hear comments, rather than debugging...
I
