On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Evan Huus eapa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Dirk Jagdmann d...@cubic.org wrote:
General thoughts from the list on whether or not this would be a good idea?
some general comments on the whole wmem idea:
memory allocation is done almost
On Oct 28, 2012, at 11:22 AM, Martin Kaiser li...@kaiser.cx wrote:
The solution we came up with is to have one DLT. The pcap packet data
consists of a pseudo-header and the actual bytes that are transfered.
The dissector picks up the direction from the pseudo-header.
The capturing tool has
On 10/28/2012 4:24 PM, bugzilla-dae...@wireshark.org wrote:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7922
Evan Huus eapa...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
It's been years since Wireshark recommended a new version of
WinPCaphttp://www.winpcap.org/ (it's
been v4.1.2 for years). Is this packet capture library still alive?
When I run the Windows 8 Upgrade
Assistanthttp://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows-8/upgrade-to-windows-8,
it reports that
I've been hacking around trying to improve the display of interface names
on Windows.
Currently there are 3 components displayed in various dialogs and command
line responses; the interface guid
(\Device\NPF_{C2E403B5-FAD0-479C-96FD-0E44EB22CD74}), the interface
description from WinPCap (Intel(R)
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 10:12:41AM -0400, Evan Huus wrote:
We might be able to fake the proper scoping using thread-local globals
if we wrap everything in functions that assert the state of a
dissection. Something like:
__thread wmem_allocator_t *packet_scope;
__thread gboolean
On Oct 28, 2012, at 4:08 PM, Jakub Zawadzki darkjames...@darkjames.pl wrote:
if user description:
- not set than: format(%s (%s), friendly_name, interface_description)
- set: only user descr.
Anyway such code should imho go to winpcap.
Which code? The code to get the friendly name, or
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Jakub Zawadzki
darkjames...@darkjames.pl wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 10:12:41AM -0400, Evan Huus wrote:
We might be able to fake the proper scoping using thread-local globals
if we wrap everything in functions that assert the state of a
dissection. Something
