On Mar 20, 2014, at 8:02 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>> It's in packet-ieee80211.c, which is impressively big. (>25k lines!)
>
> So is IEEE Std 802.11-2012. (>2k pages!) :-)
>
> To be fair, IEEE Std 802.3-2012 is 634+780+358+732+844+400 = 3748 pages, so
> it's about 1000 more pages (">2k" is 2793),
On Mar 20, 2014, at 2:24 PM, Chris Kilgour wrote:
> On 03/20/2014 01:07 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
>>
>> If the build system had open access what would keep someone from
>> uploading a shell script containing a box full of weasels wearing clown
>> shoes?
>
> Isn't the same thing true for Jenkins/
On Mar 20, 2014, at 3:20 PM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
> What's the protocol (for lack of a better term) for how the Buildbot crash
> bugs get handled?
>
> Are there specific core developers who handle them, or is it whomever wants
> to fix it please do so?
The latter. The only difference betwe
Fyi, the current Version of Jenkins works just fine with gerrit 2.8.2 on my
setup.
Regards, Roland
Am Donnerstag, 20. März 2014 schrieb Gerald Combs :
> On 3/20/14 11:40 AM, Chris Kilgour wrote:
> > Just had the unpleasant experience of having a patch submitted to gerrit
> where it sat for nearl
Howdy,
What's the protocol (for lack of a better term) for how the Buildbot crash bugs
get handled?
Are there specific core developers who handle them, or is it whomever wants to
fix it please do so?
I ask because there've been a bunch of them lately which look like dups of bug
9909 (it wasn't
On 03/20/2014 01:07 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
>
> If the build system had open access what would keep someone from
> uploading a shell script containing a box full of weasels wearing clown
> shoes?
Isn't the same thing true for Jenkins/buildbot spawned from gerrit? Surely the
build machines must
On 3/20/14 11:40 AM, Chris Kilgour wrote:
> Just had the unpleasant experience of having a patch submitted to gerrit
> where it sat for nearly one month, just got merged after a code review, then
> got reverted when buildbot revealed issues.
>
> When I have submitted to other gerrit-based projec
Just had the unpleasant experience of having a patch submitted to gerrit where
it sat for nearly one month, just got merged after a code review, then got
reverted when buildbot revealed issues.
When I have submitted to other gerrit-based projects like OpenOCD, they have an
automated build syste
In trying to look at some IB captures, I noticed that any payload data
included was never displayed in the packet details (tree) pane. It
obviously appears in the bytes pane - but nothing in the details pane.
This is with both 1.10.6 and the latest git master.
I did some poking around and debu
On 20 March 2014 11:21, Rahul Rohit wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any way by which Wireshark can capture packets for loopback
> traffic (when the source and destination ip are same)on windows or linux
> machine.
>
>
>
>
>
See the loopback capture page on the Wiki:
http://wiki.wireshark.org/CaptureSe
Hi,
Is there any way by which Wireshark can capture packets for loopback traffic
(when the source and destination ip are same)on windows or linux machine.
Regards
Rahul Rohit
===
Please refer to http://www.aricent.com
11 matches
Mail list logo
