[Wireshark-dev] How to build wireshark on Windows 8.1 with Visual Studio 2013 Express

2014-06-10 Thread Giorgio Buffa
Hello list! I would like to develop a dissector, from the current stable release (1.10.7). Is it possible to build wireshark using Microsoft Visual Studio Express 2013 for Windows Desktop, on Windows 8.1? I was not able to find a step-by step guide for this. Do you have any pointers/suggestion

Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to build wireshark on Windows 8.1 with Visual Studio 2013 Express

2014-06-10 Thread Joerg Mayer
Hello Giorgio, On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:00:47AM +0200, Giorgio Buffa wrote: I would like to develop a dissector, from the current stable release (1.10.7). Is it possible to build wireshark using Microsoft Visual Studio Express 2013 for Windows Desktop, on Windows 8.1? I was not able to

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is it possible to update the version of gcrypt?

2014-06-10 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:37:05PM +0200, Pascal Quantin wrote: 2014-06-05 21:31 GMT+02:00 Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org: On 6/5/14 7:10 AM, Pascal Quantin wrote: it's now available here: https://code.wireshark.org/review/1978 Gerald, I would be interested to know whether you

Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to build wireshark on Windows 8.1 with Visual Studio 2013 Express

2014-06-10 Thread Graham Bloice
On 10 June 2014 09:23, Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de wrote: Hello Giorgio, On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:00:47AM +0200, Giorgio Buffa wrote: I would like to develop a dissector, from the current stable release (1.10.7). Is it possible to build wireshark using Microsoft Visual Studio Express

Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to define HAVE_SSE42 with autotools?

2014-06-10 Thread Guy Harris
HAVE_SSE42 is used in two places: 1) wsutil/ws_mempbrk_sse42.c, where it controls whether to build that file at all; 2) wsutil/ws_mempbrk.c, where it controls whether to check whether the CPU has SSE 4.2 and, if it does, call the SSE 4.2 version of the code. So what HAVE_SSE42

Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to define HAVE_SSE42 with autotools?

2014-06-10 Thread Anders Broman
-Original Message- From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Guy Harris Sent: den 10 juni 2014 18:32 To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to define HAVE_SSE42 with autotools? HAVE_SSE42 is

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Patch] make-version.pl

2014-06-10 Thread Jeff Morriss
On 06/04/14 07:28, Gisle Vanem wrote: The 'Editor modelines' at end of make-version.pl should not be printed. E.g. 'perl make-version.pl -h' prints this garbage at the end: ... Options can be used in any combination. If none are specified --set-svn is assumed. # # Editor modelines -

Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to define HAVE_SSE42 with autotools?

2014-06-10 Thread Jakub Zawadzki
Hello, On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 05:06:24PM +, Anders Broman wrote: From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Guy Harris HAVE_SSE42 is used in two places: 1) wsutil/ws_mempbrk_sse42.c, where it controls whether to build

[Wireshark-dev] Backport changes in the ipmi and ipmi-trace dissectors to master-1.12

2014-06-10 Thread Dmitry Bazhenov
Hello, all, The proposed for review patch back-ports recent changes to the ipmi and ipmi-trace dissectors from the master to master-1.12 branch. https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/2117/ Change-Id: Ib269b35784c0b70892d1e0111bcfb483ea64092c By the way, is it acceptable to also port these

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Backport changes in the ipmi and ipmi-trace dissectors to master-1.12

2014-06-10 Thread Pascal Quantin
Le 11 juin 2014 07:18, Dmitry Bazhenov dim...@pigeonpoint.com a écrit : Hello, all, The proposed for review patch back-ports recent changes to the ipmi and ipmi-trace dissectors from the master to master-1.12 branch. https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/2117/ Change-Id: