Hello list!
I would like to develop a dissector, from the current stable release
(1.10.7). Is it possible to build wireshark using Microsoft Visual Studio
Express 2013 for Windows Desktop, on Windows 8.1?
I was not able to find a step-by step guide for this. Do you have any
pointers/suggestion
Hello Giorgio,
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:00:47AM +0200, Giorgio Buffa wrote:
I would like to develop a dissector, from the current stable release
(1.10.7). Is it possible to build wireshark using Microsoft Visual Studio
Express 2013 for Windows Desktop, on Windows 8.1?
I was not able to
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:37:05PM +0200, Pascal Quantin wrote:
2014-06-05 21:31 GMT+02:00 Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org:
On 6/5/14 7:10 AM, Pascal Quantin wrote:
it's now available here: https://code.wireshark.org/review/1978
Gerald, I would be interested to know whether you
On 10 June 2014 09:23, Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de wrote:
Hello Giorgio,
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:00:47AM +0200, Giorgio Buffa wrote:
I would like to develop a dissector, from the current stable release
(1.10.7). Is it possible to build wireshark using Microsoft Visual Studio
Express
HAVE_SSE42 is used in two places:
1) wsutil/ws_mempbrk_sse42.c, where it controls whether to build that
file at all;
2) wsutil/ws_mempbrk.c, where it controls whether to check whether the
CPU has SSE 4.2 and, if it does, call the SSE 4.2 version of the code.
So what HAVE_SSE42
-Original Message-
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Guy Harris
Sent: den 10 juni 2014 18:32
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to define HAVE_SSE42 with autotools?
HAVE_SSE42 is
On 06/04/14 07:28, Gisle Vanem wrote:
The 'Editor modelines' at end of make-version.pl should not be printed.
E.g. 'perl make-version.pl -h' prints this garbage at the end:
...
Options can be used in any combination. If none are specified --set-svn
is assumed.
# # Editor modelines -
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 05:06:24PM +, Anders Broman wrote:
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Guy Harris
HAVE_SSE42 is used in two places:
1) wsutil/ws_mempbrk_sse42.c, where it controls whether to build
Hello, all,
The proposed for review patch back-ports recent changes to the ipmi and
ipmi-trace dissectors from the master to master-1.12 branch.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/2117/
Change-Id: Ib269b35784c0b70892d1e0111bcfb483ea64092c
By the way, is it acceptable to also port these
Le 11 juin 2014 07:18, Dmitry Bazhenov dim...@pigeonpoint.com a écrit :
Hello, all,
The proposed for review patch back-ports recent changes to the ipmi and
ipmi-trace dissectors from the master to master-1.12 branch.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/2117/
Change-Id:
10 matches
Mail list logo