Re: [Wireshark-dev] Make CMake reuse Makefile.common?

2015-03-06 Thread Peter Wu
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 02:11:02PM -0500, Evan Huus wrote: On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Jeff Morriss jeff.morriss...@gmail.com wrote: On 03/04/15 11:55, Graham Bloice wrote: On 4 March 2015 at 16:44, Jeff Morriss jeff.morriss...@gmail.com mailto:jeff.morriss...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Make CMake reuse Makefile.common?

2015-03-06 Thread Peter Wu
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 05:50:10PM +0100, Alexis La Goutte wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Peter Wu pe...@lekensteyn.nl wrote: Hi, Recently there have been two issues due to separate copies between CMake and autofoo (missing ATH dissector, missing field registrations for

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Make CMake reuse Makefile.common?

2015-03-06 Thread Graham Bloice
On 6 March 2015 at 15:17, Peter Wu pe...@lekensteyn.nl wrote: On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 05:50:10PM +0100, Alexis La Goutte wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Peter Wu pe...@lekensteyn.nl wrote: Hi, Recently there have been two issues due to separate copies between CMake and

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Make CMake reuse Makefile.common?

2015-03-06 Thread Alexis La Goutte
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Graham Bloice graham.blo...@trihedral.com wrote: On 6 March 2015 at 15:17, Peter Wu pe...@lekensteyn.nl wrote: On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 05:50:10PM +0100, Alexis La Goutte wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Peter Wu pe...@lekensteyn.nl wrote: Hi,

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Make CMake reuse Makefile.common?

2015-03-06 Thread Graham Bloice
On 6 March 2015 at 15:31, Alexis La Goutte alexis.lagou...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Graham Bloice graham.blo...@trihedral.com wrote: On 6 March 2015 at 15:17, Peter Wu pe...@lekensteyn.nl wrote: On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 05:50:10PM +0100, Alexis La Goutte wrote:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] WS runtime error

2015-03-06 Thread Peter Wu
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 11:24:28AM -0800, Guy Harris wrote: On Mar 4, 2015, at 7:29 AM, Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de wrote: When starting Wireshark with a specific trace file (unfortunately confidential), I get the following message on startup (git head):

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Packet editor

2015-03-06 Thread Michal Labedzki
Please note that I do not insinuate that WireEdit use any part of Wireshark - only it looks like Wireshark. By the way: Wireshark already has capture editor (you can split packet from capture file/merge packet from different capture files) -- Pozdrawiam / Best regards

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Packet editor

2015-03-06 Thread Alexis La Goutte
Hi, On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu wrote: On Mar 5, 2015, at 11:18 PM, Michal Labedzki michal.labed...@tieto.com wrote: WireEdit is similar to what? We are not aware of any similar product. No Wireshark? The name... look... In the first time I think it

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Packet editor

2015-03-06 Thread Guy Harris
On Mar 5, 2015, at 11:18 PM, Michal Labedzki michal.labed...@tieto.com wrote: WireEdit is similar to what? We are not aware of any similar product. No Wireshark? The name... look... In the first time I think it is modified Wireshark. To be fair, we spell it Chassis Id Subtype in our LLDP