Re: [Wireshark-dev] Add support for remote capture in linux

2015-10-02 Thread Roland Knall
Hi Would it not be easier to achieve this using an extcap interface? You can see the extcap_example in /doc as well as androiddump for examples. Such interfaces can be configured with a separate options dialog and are quite versatile, and most of all, it does not need you to change dumpcap in a

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Add support for remote capture in linux

2015-10-02 Thread Graham Bloice
Or look at rpcapd: https://www.winpcap.org/docs/docs_40_2/html/group__remote.html On 2 October 2015 at 11:57, Roland Knall wrote: > Hi > > Would it not be easier to achieve this using an extcap interface? You can > see the extcap_example in /doc as well as androiddump for

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Add support for remote capture in linux

2015-10-02 Thread Dario Lombardo
Are there specifications for extdump interface? On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Roland Knall wrote: > Hi > > Would it not be easier to achieve this using an extcap interface? You can > see the extcap_example in /doc as well as androiddump for examples. Such > interfaces can

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Add support for remote capture in linux

2015-10-02 Thread Dario Lombardo
Do you mean to reimplement rpcapd on linux? On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Graham Bloice wrote: > Or look at rpcapd: > https://www.winpcap.org/docs/docs_40_2/html/group__remote.html > > On 2 October 2015 at 11:57, Roland Knall wrote: > >> Hi >>

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Add support for remote capture in linux

2015-10-02 Thread Dario Lombardo
Sorry, I took a look at rpcapd and noticed that it can be run on linux. Using rpcapd requires to install rpcapd on the remote machine. And some change is also required on linux wireshark since the remote capture is disabled. The ssh approach should also be taken into account IMHO because it allows

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Add support for remote capture in linux

2015-10-02 Thread Guy Harris
On Oct 2, 2015, at 3:35 AM, Dario Lombardo wrote: > Remote capture is not currently supported by the current wireshark under > linux. ...or any other OS where libpcap doesn't support it; there's nothing Linux-specific about this. > This can be achieved by ssh +

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Best algorithmic way to implement MPTCP sequence number space analysis ?

2015-10-02 Thread Evan Huus
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Matt wrote: > Hi, > > (Question is at the end, I start with an Multipath TCP introduction (MPTCP) ). > I would be interested in adding MPTCP sequence number analysis to > wireshark, similar to what is done with TCP but taking into account >

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] master 3687d39: Qt: Initial RTP playback.

2015-10-02 Thread Gerald Combs
On 10/2/15 11:45 AM, Guy Harris wrote: > >>This differs a bit from the GTK+ version in that you specify one or more >>streams to be decoded. > > It also differs in that we're not using Portaudio, we're using Qt's own audio > support. > > Should we: > > Have the autoconf script

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Master-2.0 reminder and Buildbot updates

2015-10-02 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi Gerald, 2015-10-02 22:51 GMT+02:00 Gerald Combs : > As a quick reminder, the master-2.0 branch and builders will be created on > Monday. I've also made the following changes in our Buildbot environment: > > - Upgraded to Qt 5.3.2 on the Windows 64-bit, 32-bit, and Petri