Moreover, be sure your code compiles on the master. Changes are expected to
run on top of it. Backport to older versions happen for bugfixes only.
Since it looks to me this is not your case it is basically pointless to
test it on top of stable versions.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 6:26 PM Graham
On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 17:18, Crawford, Anthony R <
anthony.r.crawf...@charter.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> This week was the first time I’ve submitted code to the Wireshark project.
> My first submission was for packet-mpeg-dsmcc.c. (
> https://code.wireshark.org/review/34258)
>
> I built and
Hi everyone,
This week was the first time I've submitted code to the Wireshark project. My
first submission was for packet-mpeg-dsmcc.c.
(https://code.wireshark.org/review/34258)
I built and run both 2.6.10 and 3.0.3 versions of Wireshark successfully on my
Ubuntu 16.04 VM. I would like to
Thanks this was the elegant solution:
proto_tree_add_bitmask_with_flags(sub_tree, tvb, offset, msg_id,
ett_dsmcc_message_id, bf_message_id, ENC_NA, BMT_NO_APPEND);
AC
From: Wireshark-dev On Behalf Of Alexis
La Goutte
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2019 2:32 AM
To: Developer support list for
Hi
Look proto_tree_add_bitmask_with_flags and there is a flag for don't append
the top
Cheers
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 12:48 AM Crawford, Anthony R <
anthony.r.crawf...@charter.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I need some help dissecting a field with its flags. I am trying to present
> the dissection
