Issues are tracked over on Gitlab.
https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/issues

Could you move your pcap and notes to a new issue over there?


On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:33 AM S. Jäkel via Wireshark-dev <
wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> wrote:

> Hi Wireshark team,
>
> an RDM packet from E1.37-1 with the name
> FREQUENCY_MODULATION_DESCRIPTION is interpreted and displayed
> incorrectly by wireshark.
> There was forgotten to consider an int32 which stands before the actual
> description in the package.
> In the attached record you can see the problem in the 2nd package
> Enclosed a screenshot with explanation and also the RDM protocol 1.37-1
>
> It would be nice if this bug is fixed.
>
> With kind regards
>
> S. Jäkel
>
>
> WireSharkVersion
>
> Version 4.0.6 (v4.0.6-0-gac2f5a01286a).
>
> Compiled (64-bit) using Microsoft Visual Studio 2022 (VC++ 14.32, build
> 31332),
> with GLib 2.72.3, with PCRE2, with zlib 1.2.12, with Qt 5.15.2, with
> libpcap,
> with Lua 5.2.4, with GnuTLS 3.6.3 and PKCS #11 support, with Gcrypt
> 1.10.1, with
> Kerberos (MIT), with MaxMind, with nghttp2 1.46.0, with brotli, with
> LZ4, with
> Zstandard, with Snappy, with libxml2 2.9.14, with libsmi 0.4.8, with
> QtMultimedia, with automatic updates using WinSparkle 0.5.7, with
> AirPcap, with
> SpeexDSP (using bundled resampler), with Minizip, with binary plugins.
>
> Running on 64-bit Windows 10 (22H2), build 19045, with Intel(R) Core(TM)
> i7-4930K CPU @ 3.40GHz (with SSE4.2), with 16319 MB of physical memory,
> with
> GLib 2.72.3, with PCRE2 10.40 2022-04-14, with Qt 5.15.2, with Npcap
> version
> 1.71, based on libpcap version 1.10.2-PRE-GIT, with c-ares 1.18.1, with
> GnuTLS
> 3.6.3, with Gcrypt 1.10.1, with nghttp2 1.46.0, with brotli 1.0.9, with LZ4
> 1.9.3, with Zstandard 1.5.2, without AirPcap, with light display mode,
> without
> HiDPI, with LC_TYPE=German_Germany.utf8, binary plugins supported.
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to