On 2/17/2013 9:18 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
On Feb 17, 2013, at 4:52 PM, wme...@wireshark.org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=47724
User: wmeier
Date: 2013/02/17 04:52 PM
Log:
Implement proto_tree_write_fields without using ep_strbufs.
- Fixes
On 2/11/2013 8:23 AM, eapa...@wireshark.org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=47629
User: eapache
Date: 2013/02/11 05:23 AM
Log:
Add an if (tree) check to prevent a very-long-but-not-infinite loop,
since without a tree the proto_tree_add_item calls
On 2/10/2013 7:37 AM, Rajinish Kumar wrote:
Hello,
am facing the below issue for a pcap trace captured from Ericsson node
Dissector for OID:1.2.826.0.1249.58.1.0 not implemented. Contact
Wireshark developers if you want this supported
Please file an enhancement request at
On 1/28/2013 3:31 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
Tangentially, CppCheck [1] has support for custom checks using
plugins. I've never had time to investigate properly, but I suspect
that implementing the three check scripts (checkhf, checkAPIs,
checkfiltername) as CppCheck plugins would be a major win,
I've been doing a small update to checkAPIs.pl.
Among other things: I changed the code to remove comments from the
source code string before calling check_hf_entries() since the check
doesn't detect an hf... entry if it contains a comment.
I now get:
Error: the name for hf_ppi_vector_rot_x
On 1/28/2013 2:58 PM, wme...@wireshark.org wrote:
Log:
Re-implemention of checkhf.pl:
Main objective: reduce the number of false positives.
Normal usage: the same as for checkhf.pl.
For now: named checkhf-v2.pl
I've just committed a re-implementation of checkhf.pl and named it
On 1/28/2013 3:31 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
Tangentially, CppCheck [1] has support for custom checks using
plugins. I've never had time to investigate properly, but I suspect
that implementing the three check scripts (checkhf, checkAPIs,
checkfiltername) as CppCheck plugins would be a major win,
On 1/18/2013 1:21 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
Does anyone use the packet list and protocol tree selection mode
preferences? A long time ago in a GTK+ version far far away you could
click-drag in GTK_SELECTION_BROWSE mode and have the selection follow
the mouse. Now GTK_SELECTION_BROWSE and
On my Windows 7 system:
After adding the appropriate rule to gtk/makefile.nmake to generate
layouts.h gdb-pixbuf-cssource fails when he rule is executed.
Doing a test command:
$ gdk-pixbuf-csource --raw --name=foo layout_1.png
Gives:
failed to load layout_1.png: Couldn't recognize the
On 1/19/2013 1:18 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
On 1/19/13 8:28 AM, Bill Meier wrote:
layout_[1-6].png were generated from Inkscape via layouts.svg. They have
the proper MIME types set in SVN so they *should* work. Are you using
gdk-pixbuf-csource from the wireshark-win32-libs GTK+ bundle? I'm
On 1/13/2013 8:00 PM, Danniel_zeng wrote:
Thanks Anders Broman and Guy Harris
But How can I see the entire error ? As i don't know what the exact
error is .
If you look at the prceeding output there should (will) be an error
message explicitly saying something like warning ... or error
On 1/5/2013 1:30 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
I've been playing with some of the bugzilla statistics tools recently,
and I am pleased to discover that despite a record number of reported
bugs in 2012, we managed to shrink the backlog by 26 bugs.
My raw data:
Year - Created - Resolved
2012 - 1449 -
Anders:
In SVN #46614 you changed config.nmake GTK3 (for Win32) to switch back
to 3.4.0-3.9.
r46614 | etxrab | 2012-12-19 01:55:11 -0500 (Wed, 19 Dec 2012) | 1 line
Don't yse the new GTK3 bundle, it lacks the tools
On 12/18/2012 11:43 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
On Dec 18, 2012, at 5:08 PM, eapa...@wireshark.org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=46606
User: eapache
Date: 2012/12/18 05:08 PM
Log: Try to fix windows builds - MSVC doesn't like
g_assert_not_reached() ?
On 12/18/2012 11:48 PM, Bill Meier wrote:
On 12/18/2012 11:43 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
On Dec 18, 2012, at 5:08 PM, eapa...@wireshark.org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=46606
User: eapache
Date: 2012/12/18 05:08 PM
Log: Try to fix windows builds
On 12/7/2012 1:05 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
On 12/5/12 1:37 PM, Bill Meier wrote:
On 12/5/2012 2:57 PM, Bill Meier wrote:
On 12/5/2012 2:32 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
In cases like bug 8045 [1], it would have been handy for it to say in
the report somewhere which build-bot (version and OS) had found
On 12/6/2012 6:19 PM, g...@wireshark.org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=46431
User: guy
Date: 2012/12/06 03:19 PM
Log:
Squelch some -Wshadow warnings (inappropriate warnings - they're just
names in a prototype declaration - but maybe that's what you
On 12/6/2012 6:44 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
Hmm. Maybe the test for can I enable -Wshadow should be does the
compiler support it *and* does it complain about names in prototype
declarations shadowing variables?, not just does the compiler
support it?
My thoughts, exactly, but left for
On 12/5/2012 2:32 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
In cases like bug 8045 [1], it would have been handy for it to say in
the report somewhere which build-bot (version and OS) had found the
error... is that reasonably easy to do?
Thanks,
Evan
I agree completely: As I've going through the process of
On 12/5/2012 2:57 PM, Bill Meier wrote:
On 12/5/2012 2:32 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
In cases like bug 8045 [1], it would have been handy for it to say in
the report somewhere which build-bot (version and OS) had found the
error... is that reasonably easy to do?
I agree completely: As I've going
On 11/30/2012 2:05 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
It looks like I should have read the release notes more closely. Fuzz
failure reporting uses the bugzilla-submit script, which requires
converting to a new status workflow in Bugzilla 4.0 and 4.2:
On 11/30/2012 4:08 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
Would UNCONFIRMED be less confusing than CONFIRMED?
I would think so. It's bothered me for a while that we didn't have a way
to distinguish between brand new, nobody has looked at it yet bugs and
solution identified, but nobody wants to work on it
On 11/23/2012 8:16 AM, Gisle Vanem wrote:
Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
Checked in (with the checks and #defines moved up a little earlier).
Thanks. Works fine now. But I'm curious about why this:
#if 0 /* XXX: including config.h causes compilation errors; TBD: why */
#include
On 11/20/2012 3:48 AM, Zadik, Maayan wrote:
Yes the composite TVB is displayed as single sequence but the
composite is in fact several TVBs concatenated together, so when I
click on a field that was generated from the second concatenated TVB,
it is displays in the byte pane as if it's the base
On 11/19/2012 2:48 PM, Zadik, Maayan wrote:
Hi,
I’m using TVB composite to assemble some data chunks, using
tvb_new_child_real_data.
My problem is that every chunk is displayed in the byte pane as if it’s
at offset=0 instead of its actual location in the original TVB.
Does anybody know how I
The recently added file 'capture_win_ifnames.c' fails to compile if
config.h is included.
After a bit of poking around, I found that (one or both of) 2 defines in
config.h (shown below) cause the problem. (That is:
'capture_win_ifnames.c' compiles OK if the two defines are commented out.
On 10/28/2012 12:20 PM, Zadik, Maayan wrote:
Hi all,
How do I create a single TVB from several data chunks?
Is there a way to append two TVBs?
I know the composite doesn't work. I tried it.
Regards,
Maayan
Well: you can create your own tvb using tvb_new_real_data() pointing to
a buffer
On 10/28/2012 4:24 PM, bugzilla-dae...@wireshark.org wrote:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7922
Evan Huus eapa...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
. How are you determining the
actual length of the PDU in get_foo_message_len() ?
dissect_foo_message() will be handed a tvb of whatever length is
returned by get_foo_message_len()
(12 Oct, 06:48) Bill Meier
Comment:
void proto_reg_handoff_dataparse(void
On 10/15/2012 11:05 AM, Bill Meier wrote:
Hi Bill, I didn't finish the code, now i'm testing the function
tcp_dissect_pdus() to check whether it works. But i try to give specific
code in the below comment. besides that I have two questions: 1. I
cannot get the len in advance, for the protocol
On 10/11/2012 1:27 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
Actually, this one:
for(sid_number = 1; sid_number = number_of_sids; sid_number++) {
proto_tree_add_item(parameter_tree, hf_stream_reset_sid, parameter_tvb,
sid_offset, SID_LENGTH, ENC_BIG_ENDIAN);
sid_offset += SID_LENGTH;
}
While working with a *nix version of GTK3 Wireshark, I noticed that the
pull-down menus (File, Edit, etc) were not clearly delineated from
the underlying window.
IOW: there's no border around the drop-down.
To my eye the missing borders make the dropdowns more difficult to read.
[
...
On 9/29/2012 5:49 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Bill Meier wme...@newsguy.com wrote:
My inclination: test the return value of the various set*id calls and if
fail, do g_error().
Thoughts ?
I'd be tempted to make it a g_warning() since Wireshark will
*probably* keep
On 9/29/2012 11:49 AM, cmayn...@wireshark.org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=45212
User: cmaynard
Date: 2012/09/29 08:49 AM
Log:
Revert most of r45210. We don't use the return value of GetExitCodeProcess(),
but it still needs to be called to get
On 9/29/2012 12:02 PM, Bill Meier wrote:
On 9/29/2012 11:49 AM, cmayn...@wireshark.org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=45212
User: cmaynard
Date: 2012/09/29 08:49 AM
Log:
Revert most of r45210. We don't use the return value of
GetExitCodeProcess
On 8/21/2012 2:19 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
On Aug 20, 2012, at 12:49 PM, Kaul wrote:
If it were git, I'm sure I could easily use 'git bisect' and find the issue.
As Evan Huus indicated, what you probably need to bisect is compiler updates.
:-)
The offending routine is probably
On 9/23/2012 5:27 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
...
While investigating the issue about win32.mak being not part of VS2012,
I think I also read that SDK 8 is smaller because the SDK no longer
includes compilers etc and that the compilers needed to be downloaded
separately (VS2012EE, etc).
On 9/23/2012 6:20 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
On Sep 23, 2012, at 3:11 PM, Bill Meier wme...@newsguy.com wrote:
While investigating the issue about win32.mak being not part of VS2012, I think I
also read that SDK 8 is smaller because the SDK no longer includes compilers
etc
On 9/23/2012 6:56 PM, Bill Meier wrote:
On 9/23/2012 6:20 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
I *think* both 32bit and 64bit compilers (and SDK ?) are available as
part of VS2012 although I can't find the page with the info at the moment;
https://www.microsoft.com/visualstudio/eng/products/visual-studio
On 9/18/2012 3:35 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
darkja...@wireshark.org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=44860
User: darkjames
Date: 2012/09/10 02:40 PM
Log:
Initial commit to support yet another method of passing data between
dissectors.
Add new parameter
On 9/18/2012 4:18 PM, Maynard, Chris wrote:
From
http://ask.wireshark.org/questions/14343/setting-development-project-under-visual-studio-2012,
you indicated the error was:
ws2tcpip.h(531) : error C2373: 'ws_inet_pton' : redefinition; different type
modifiers.
Could this be because of the
On 9/16/2012 2:26 PM, bugzilla-dae...@wireshark.org wrote:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7729
--- Comment #5 from Alexander Koeppe forma...@online.de 2012-09-16 11:26:18
PDT ---
Thank for your comments and hints.
I'll go back and work on that to provide a new version.
On 9/15/2012 4:35 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
The obvious solution for now is to remove the comments that are
getting falsely picked up as function definitions, but the better fix
is to the make-dissector-reg scripts. Is it valid for there to be two
register functions in a file, or could the scripts
config.nmake:
has GTK_PKG=3.4.2-3.5 as the GTK3 version desired;
However: the GTK3 bundles available (32 bit) in svn are:
svn tag: [Wireshark-win32-libs] / tags / 2012-05-30 / packages
has: gtk+-bundle_3.4.2-2.4_win32ws.zip
svn trunk: [Wireshark-win32-libs] / trunk / packages
has:
[Graham Bloice said]
Some folks have articulated the drawbacks (to them) of making these
changes but I haven't seen any actual advantages listed. Can anyone list
them as they see it?
+1
___
Sent via:
On 8/27/2012 9:29 AM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
Hi Gerald,
I noticed that looking at a revision by pointing my web browser at
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc?revision=Xview=revision doesn't
look very good today (fonts are big, spacing seems to be off). More
troubling is I'm not getting any
On 8/18/2012 10:27 PM, mart...@wireshark.org wrote:
Found error by adding temp debug to _match_strval_ext_init() - do we
ever expect the entries not to be in order?
If the effort is taken to use an extended value string, then the value
string array entries ought to be in order such that
On 8/17/2012 7:59 AM, bugzilla-dae...@wireshark.org wrote:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7647
Michael Mann mman...@netscape.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
A little checking of the buildbot info indicates that the fix was
committed after the build started.
Build:
Timing:
StartThu Aug 16 06:23:06 2012
EndThu Aug 16 23:45:08 2012
r44540 was committed @ 6:58 Am (Pacific time).
To be specific: It appears that the build was done with
SVN
It appears that this bug has existed for a while and has just recently
been reported by a user.
IOW: maybe accessing the 'Apply as Filter' and 'Prepare a Filter'
functionality via the 'Analyze' dropdown isn't used much.
So: Given that there's already a lot of choices on the 'Analyze'
On 7/23/2012 1:52 AM, Krishnamurthy Mayya wrote:
Hi Bill,
To answer your questions:
a) I am using Centos version - 6.2 (Oracle Virtual Box Environment)
b) Yes, i am building unchanged Wireshark SVN code.
(*wireshark-1.9.0-SVN-43850, which i have downloaded from the repository*).
c) After
On 7/22/2012 6:15 AM, bugzilla-dae...@wireshark.org wrote:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7493
--- Comment #5 from Martin Kaiser wiresh...@kaiser.cx 2012-07-22 03:14:58 PDT
---
Hi,
some more comments
Variables should be declared at the beginning of a function, not
On 7/23/2012 12:19 AM, Krishnamurthy Mayya wrote:
Hi all,
When i am trying to run the wireshark through command prompt, i am
getting the following error.
Any clue what might have gone wrong? How to correct this???
*/home/wireshark-1.9.0-SVN-43850/.libs/lt-wireshark: symbol lookup
error:
This is rather bizarre. The problem is revision 43646. I have
double-checked by reverting just those two lines on my local latest
trunk, and the bisection is accurate - somehow revision 43646 is the
problem.
I see that the code it calls does some things with the packet display,
but the crash is
I'm not exactly sure what's up with the v150fw dissector, since
it defines a heuristic which is never used and registers in no tables.
The comments indicate it's carried over rtp, but rtp doesn't have a
heuristic table.
FWIW: packet-rtp.c does register the v150fw dissector to the
rtp
On 7/16/2012 2:18 PM, Stephen Fisher wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 08:56:28 -0600 Joerg Mayer wrote
I opened https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7377
a while ago but except for one person who added a me too nothing
happend. This problem basically makes the GTK3 version
On 7/7/2012 2:06 PM, Martin Kaiser wrote:
Hi,
Thus wrote Akos Vandra (axo...@gmail.com):
I'm having problems building wireshark with Qt. I'm trying to build on
Ubuntu 10.04LTS x64, with QT 4.7.0, qmake 2.01a, latest svn revision
at the moment, r43597.
I used the following commands to
On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
Arun Sharma wrote:
Does in coding convention, it Limit lines to 79 characters?
I have gone through README.developer but didn't find any such
restriction.
Even when i see some codes, packet-tcp.c etc, some or most lines does
not limit to 79 characters.
On 7/3/2012 11:22 AM, Stephen Fisher wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 08:45:46 -0600 Richard Sharpe wrote
There are protocols that specify the use of KRB5 specified values.
Eg, NegoEx specifies RFC3961 strings.
Rather than simply re-entering these values it would be useful to
reuse the
On 6/26/2012 12:56 AM, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Hi folks,
I noticed some inconsistencies in the command naming. The following
patch fixes those (so that they now match between SMB and SMB2):
Index: epan/dissectors/packet-smb2.c
===
On 6/26/2012 3:36 PM, pas...@wireshark.org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=43497
User: pascal
Date: 2012/06/26 12:36 PM
Log:
Display expert codes in hexadecimal (less painful for my eyes :))
The real question:
Why are the essentially meaningless
On 6/26/2012 6:18 PM, Pascal Quantin wrote:
This is due to the now forbidden usage of BASE_NONE with FT_(U)INT* done
in r43412.
I first used a BASE_CUSTOM to get completely rid of the numeric display
but then nice filters like expert.severity == Note were not working
anymore :( Thus the tradeoff
On 6/20/2012 9:52 AM, Pedro Fuentes Ortega wrote:
.
Hello,
This is the my first post and do not know if is the right way to question.
In the company I work we used two proprietary protocols to communicate,
in a private network, diferent equipments. One protocol uses udp port
3500 and the other
On 6/20/2012 10:47 AM, Pedro Fuentes Ortega wrote:
Yes, the frames are displayed but but aren't dissected by the dissector.
Does 'tshark -G decodes | grep udp\.port' show your dissector as being
registered on udp.port 3800 ?
If not, then maybe there's something wrong with your code to
On 6/20/2012 1:12 AM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
The following commit retriggered an allergic reaction to controlling function
behaviour via booleans:
if (cf_save_packets(cfile, file_name8-str, filetype,
FALSE/*compressed */, FALSE/*discard_comments */, FALSE/* dont_reopen */) != CF_OK) {
To
On 6/14/2012 10:55 AM, Petr Sumbera wrote:
Hi,
why do I have installed ui/qt directory with all png files when I built
1.8.rc1 with gtk?
Thanks,
Petr
The ui/qt directory (and contents) is part of the source tarball (I'm
assuming you built from the tarball).
When you build with gtk,
On 6/11/2012 3:24 PM, Jakub Zawadzki wrote:
Hi,
Bill recently converted lot of code which were using value_string API to
newer value_string_ext API.
But the problem is that not all value_string arrays are sorted for
faster access.
If value_string_ext is used in hfinfo it can be easily found
On 6/9/2012 2:26 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
The code in epan/proto.c seems to indicate that using BASE_NONE with
FT_*INT* types should be OK when there the strings converter is supplied:
case FT_UINT32:
case FT_UINT64:
if (hfinfo-strings == NULL) {
/* Require integral types (other than frame
Not really knowing much about this, I do note that there is a lua
library named 'lua5_1_4_Win32_dll9_lib.zip' (as well as
'lua5_1_4_Win32_dll6_lib.zip'); config.nmake for win32 specifies:
LUA_DIST=5_1_4_Win32_dll6
LUA_DIR=$(WIRESHARK_LIB_DIR)\lua5.1.4
I also note that config.nmake for win64
FYI:
I'm in the midst of updating the files associated with bug #6844:
packet-ua.c
packet-ua3g.c
packet-uasip.c
packet-noe.c
packet-uaudp.c
packet-uaudp.h
I expect to commit the changes later today
Bill
___
Sent
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
On 6/3/2012 5:12 PM, René Scheibe wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed when upgrading from 1.2.15 to 1.6.8 that the file
dictionary.3gpp now contains an invalid entry. There is a typo (3GGP
instead of 3GPP) and the decoding is incorrect too.
wireshark:
ATTRIBUTE 3GGP-IMEISV 20 octets
freeradius:
On 5/26/2012 7:40 PM, Akos Vandra wrote:
On 27 May 2012 01:18, Pascal Quantinpascal.quan...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 27 mai 2012 à 01:12, Akos Vandraaxo...@gmail.com a écrit :
Sorry, I forgot to mention: I am running ubuntu 10.10, x64 version.
On 27 May 2012 01:05, Akos Vandraaxo...@gmail.com
On 5/24/2012 12:02 PM, Jakub Zawadzki wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:35:34AM -0400, Tobias Weiss wrote:
I'm using tcp_dissect_pdus() to reassemble packets in my dissector. One of
my functions will calculate the length of the real message based on a
header with a fixed length
On 5/24/2012 12:24 PM, Bill Meier wrote:
On 5/24/2012 12:02 PM, Jakub Zawadzki wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:35:34AM -0400, Tobias Weiss wrote:
I'm using tcp_dissect_pdus() to reassemble packets in my dissector.
One of
my functions will calculate the length of the real message based
On 4/30/2012 7:08 PM, g...@wireshark.org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=42368
User: guy
Date: 2012/04/30 04:08 PM
Log:
No C++-style comments, please; some C compilers reject them.
Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/
ChangesPathAction
On 4/26/2012 8:55 AM, Tobias Weiss wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm currently developing a dissector for a quite old TCP protocol. Most
of the stuff is straight forward and not a real problem. But right now
I'm facing an issue and need some help.
In my main dissector function I'm calling
Can pcapng files also be given a mime-type of application/vnd.tcpdump.pcap ?
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe:
On 4/23/2012 2:51 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
Most of Wireshark 1.6.x uses GLib memory slices only if built with
GLib 2.10 or later; it uses memory chunks otherwise.
However, MATE unconditionally uses memory slices, which means it
fails to build with GLib releases prior to 2.10. The configure
On 4/22/2012 9:36 PM, wme...@wireshark.org wrote:
Fixes Bug #7138 (https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7138)
A puzzle: why did the buildbot fuzz-testing only start failing on this on
04/18/2012
since the bug has existed for quite some time ?
I now see that
On 4/1/2012 4:46 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
I managed to convince Bugzilla to automatically link SVN revision
references in bug comments (e.g. r12345) to the repository viewer at
anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc. The regex looks for r, rev, and
revision:
(?:r|rev \#?|revision \#?)\s?\d{1,6}
On 3/14/2012 3:52 PM, Akos Vandra wrote:
Hi!
I'm developing a dissector for a proprrietary protocol. It has been
working up until now. Today it started crashing wireshark, with the
not very helpful message:
20:48:51 Err Memory corrupted
Aborted
Can you please help me what could be
Would it make any sense to be able to store application specific
information in a pcapng file ?
E.g., selected Wireshark prefs so that Wireshark can act on same ?
This would be useful when a capture file reqires specific dissector
preferences to properly dissect the file.
Would this fit (at
On 2/29/2012 9:47 AM, Anders Broman wrote:
Sorry my fault, I checked in a change to config.win32 and my default is MSVC10.
On Windows I do the following so I don't have to touch config.nmak
1. Set some environment variables
set MSVC_VARIANT=MSVC2008
set VERSION_EXTRA=-DEV
...
2. Do
On 2/24/2012 9:22 AM, Steven W. Stoner wrote:
Hello all,
I just installed your version 1.7.0 SVN Rev 39768 from /trunk and
started the application. There is an error you have in initial window
placement, which is difficult to resolve in Windows 7. The problem is
that on a two monitor system,
On 2/19/2012 10:49 AM, Christopher Maynard wrote:
The Windows buildbots are all failing with:
Linking tshark.exe
link @C:\Users\buildbot\AppData\Local\Temp\nm2AA1.tmp
LINK : fatal error LNK1181: cannot open input file 'ui/cli/tap-afpstat.obj'
Running nmake -f Makefile.nmake
On 2/13/2012 3:12 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
On Feb 12, 2012, at 9:46 PM, 李刚 wrote:
I have an Vendor Specific Action and want to add an dissector for
it.
Usually, an dissector is added by:
udp_table = DissectorTable.get(udp.port)
udp_table:add(,trivial_proto)
But for an Action
On 2/12/2012 2:29 AM, Rafi Lavi wrote:
erf.c
erf.c(651) : warning C4244: '=' : conversion from 'gint64' to 'int',
possible loss of data
This compiles w/o a warning using my Windows 2008 compiler to compile
the latest SVN (development) Wireshark source.
Which version of the Wireshark source
On 2/12/2012 11:27 AM, Bill Meier wrote:
On 2/12/2012 2:29 AM, Rafi Lavi wrote:
erf.c
erf.c(651) : warning C4244: '=' : conversion from 'gint64' to 'int',
possible loss of data
This compiles w/o a warning using my Windows 2008 compiler to compile
the latest SVN (development) Wireshark source
Jörg:
Thanks for the detailed write-up.
Bill
(See below)
On 2/3/2012 10:51 AM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
qtshark:
- maybe we can attract a seasoned qt-developer to help us getting started
with the qtshark design stuff
+1
cmake:
- on windows
+ cmake would allow out-of-tree builds on
On 2/3/2012 11:50 AM, Graham Bloice wrote:
cmake:
- on windows
+ cmake would allow out-of-tree builds on Windows
+ starting with a cygwin/nmake alternative would be an idea as there is
no native windows / VisualStudio setup available right now.
Meaning: out-of-tree using
From doc/README.qt
Autotools + QMake is a basket full of crazy that hasn't yet
been sorted and folded.
(Autotools + Boring Old Make, without using
QMake at all, might actually be simpler:
+1 !
-
Understanding and coping with the details of qmake doesn't particularly
appeal to me.
Can someone knowledgeable about QT comment on the implications for
Wireshark Qt of the following ?
http://labs.qt.nokia.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Qt5.pdf
There are statements like the following:
Qt 5.0 will be the foundation for a new way of developing
applications. While offering all
On 1/31/2012 5:02 PM, Bill Meier wrote:
Can someone knowledgeable about QT comment on the implications for
Wireshark Qt of the following ?
http://labs.qt.nokia.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Qt5.pdf
There are statements like the following:
Qt 5.0 will be the foundation for a new way
On 1/29/2012 11:37 PM, wme...@wireshark.org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=40768
User: wmeier
Date: 2012/01/29 08:37 PM
Log:
Rework Windows Wireshark Qt build configuration a bit:
1. Compile and link with (almost exactly) the same options as used
On 1/25/2012 8:04 AM, tue...@wireshark.org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=40715
capture_if_dlg.c: In function ‘store_selected’:
capture_if_dlg.c:168:12: warning: variable ‘found’ set but not used
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
capture_if_dlg.c: In
On 1/15/2012 12:41 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
Hello,
compiling with current glib (2.31.6) dies with:
[ 95%] Building C object plugins/mate/CMakeFiles/mate.dir/mate_runtime.c.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/Users/jmayer/wireshark/svn/plugins/mate/mate_runtime.c: In function
I was curious about the code being being generated by the Windows
compiler for the g_?to? macros so I used the /FAs option to generate a
listing which contained the assembly code for one of the dissectors.
Upon examining the code, I found it to be rather inefficient.
Upon poking around a bit,
On 1/10/2012 2:47 PM, Andriy Beregovenko wrote:
Hi,
I'm write a custom dissector, and it works fine... under Linux, but not
under Windows. Thus I have a problem to run wireshark under Windows as well
as debug problem.
So, I built wireshark stable version 1.6.4 and 1.4.10 using manual [0]. Of
On 1/10/2012 3:02 PM, Bill Meier wrote:
On 1/10/2012 2:47 PM, Andriy Beregovenko wrote:
Hi,
I'm write a custom dissector, and it works fine... under Linux, but not
under Windows. Thus I have a problem to run wireshark under Windows as
well
as debug problem.
So, I built wireshark stable version
101 - 200 of 631 matches
Mail list logo
