Now these changes are in the svn tree.
Note that I've moved some dissectors from DISSECTOR_SRC to
CLEAN_DISSECTOR_SRC but there are many others which could already be
moved to CLEAN_DISSECTOR_SRC.
Regards,
Sebastien Tandel
I made it partly for the Unix side. (Makefile.common and Makefile.am
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 05:01:06PM +0200, Sebastien Tandel wrote:
I made it partly for the Unix side. (Makefile.common and Makefile.am
affected).
The Makefile is, in fact, building now four libraries :
- asn dissectors : libasndissectors.la
- pidl dissectors : libpidldissectors.la
- normal
On Apr 2, 2007, at 4:13 PM, Stephen Fisher wrote:
We're still compiling epan/dissectors with a ton of warnings from
auto-generated dissectors on Unix.
How many of them are coming from asn2wrs-generated dissectors?
asn2wrs is, for some reason, generating a lot of dissect_ functions
that
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 04:40:05PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
On Apr 2, 2007, at 4:13 PM, Stephen Fisher wrote:
We're still compiling epan/dissectors with a ton of warnings from
auto-generated dissectors on Unix.
How many of them are coming from asn2wrs-generated dissectors?
asn2wrs
Gisle Vanem wrote:
Graham Bloice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gisle Vanem wrote:
The #pragma warning() statements are MSVC specific. So
embed them inside #ifdef _MSC_VER.
I always thought unrecognised #pragma directives were ignored. I take
it that MinGw barfs on them in some way?
MingW
I dont think it is really realistic to have all autogenerated files
always compile without any warnings.
Maybe we should instead split Makefile.common up into three parts :
First part : normal dissectors
Second part : ANS2WRS generated dissectors which take extra compile
time flags and
On 3/28/07, Ulf Lamping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ronnie sahlberg wrote:
I dont think it is really realistic to have all autogenerated files
always compile without any warnings.
Maybe we should instead split Makefile.common up into three parts :
First part : normal dissectors
Second
On 3/28/07, ronnie sahlberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/28/07, Ulf Lamping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ronnie sahlberg wrote:
I dont think it is really realistic to have all autogenerated files
always compile without any warnings.
Maybe we should instead split Makefile.common up into
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 08:21:24AM +, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
I dont think it is really realistic to have all autogenerated files
always compile without any warnings.
Which warnings do you have in mind specifically? Why do you think they
can't be avoided?
Maybe we should instead split
I dont think it is really realistic to have all autogenerated files
always compile without any warnings.
Maybe we should instead split Makefile.common up into three parts :
First part : normal dissectors
Second part : ANS2WRS generated dissectors which take extra compile
time flags and
On 3/28/07, Sebastien Tandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dont think it is really realistic to have all autogenerated files
always compile without any warnings.
Maybe we should instead split Makefile.common up into three parts :
First part : normal dissectors
Second part : ANS2WRS
Hi Ulf,
Maybe we should instead split Makefile.common up into three parts :
First part : normal dissectors
Second part : ANS2WRS generated dissectors which take extra compile
time flags and definitions to suppress artefacts from the compiler.
Third part : PIDL generated dissectors that
The #pragma warning() statements are MSVC specific. So
embed them inside #ifdef _MSC_VER.
Patch attached.
--gv
diff -u3 -Hb -r SVN-Latest\asn1\rrlp\packet-rrlp-template.c
.\asn1\rrlp\packet-rrlp-template.c
--- SVN-Latest\asn1\rrlp\packet-rrlp-template.c Tue Mar 27 17:18:46 2007
+++
Gisle Vanem wrote:
The #pragma warning() statements are MSVC specific. So
embed them inside #ifdef _MSC_VER.
I always thought unrecognised #pragma directives were ignored. I take
it that MinGw barfs on them in some way?
--
Regards,
Graham Bloice
Graham Bloice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gisle Vanem wrote:
The #pragma warning() statements are MSVC specific. So
embed them inside #ifdef _MSC_VER.
I always thought unrecognised #pragma directives were ignored. I take
it that MinGw barfs on them in some way?
MingW ignores them, but
Gisle Vanem wrote:
The #pragma warning() statements are MSVC specific. So
embed them inside #ifdef _MSC_VER.
Patch attached.
checked in,
If you still have such problems, please note.
Regards, ULFL
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Ulf Lamping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you still have such problems, please note.
There's still some in generated files. It seems someone added the pragmas after
they where autogenerated. IMHO the #pragma should go elsewhere. But
where, should be left to the experts.
A patch for now:
diff
Gisle Vanem wrote:
Ulf Lamping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you still have such problems, please note.
There's still some in generated files. It seems someone added the pragmas
after
they where autogenerated. IMHO the #pragma should go elsewhere. But
where, should be left to the
18 matches
Mail list logo
