Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-users] bit operations aremissingfrom lua bindings?

2009-06-10 Thread Sam Roberts
2009/6/10 Stig Bjørlykke s...@bjorlykke.org: On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Sam Robertsvieuxt...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for including the range and bitfield. Will this be in the next release? 1.2 is currently in feature freeze, so the range and bitfield have to wait. No problem, I

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-users] bit operations aremissingfrom lua bindings?

2009-06-09 Thread Sam Roberts
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Bálint Réczeybalint.rec...@ericsson.com wrote: I forgot to add the __gc. Feel free to add the __gc or change the userdata to contain uint itself. I can't do it myself because I'm on holiday, far from my development machine. It's easier to work with 64-bit

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-users] bit operations aremissingfrom lua bindings?

2009-06-08 Thread Bálint Réczey
Sent: Fri 6/5/2009 13:37 To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-users] bit operations aremissingfrom lua bindings? On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Sam Roberts vieuxt...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/6/5 Stig Bjørlykke s...@bjorlykke.org: On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1