Re: [Wireshark-dev] CMake cache

Stig, On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 06:04:01PM +0100, Stig Bj?rlykke wrote: > With the latest cmake changes (enable -Werror in r30852) I got some > problems with illegal arguments to gcc. It seems like the WS_C_FLAG_ > values are cached and not regenerated when the WIRESHARK_C_FLAGS or > WIRESHAR

Re: [Wireshark-dev] CMake cache

On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 06:04:01PM +0100, Stig Bj?rlykke wrote: > With the latest cmake changes (enable -Werror in r30852) I got some > problems with illegal arguments to gcc. It seems like the WS_C_FLAG_ > values are cached and not regenerated when the WIRESHARK_C_FLAGS or > WIRESHARK_EXTRA

[Wireshark-dev] CMake cache

Hi, With the latest cmake changes (enable -Werror in r30852) I got some problems with illegal arguments to gcc. It seems like the WS_C_FLAG_ values are cached and not regenerated when the WIRESHARK_C_FLAGS or WIRESHARK_EXTRA_C_FLAGS lists are changed, so the wrong -W arguments are added t