Howdy,
I'm writing a wiretap file reader for a format which uses ascii encoding for
metadata, and I'd like to use regex/PCRE for it. (it would be a lot
cleaner/simpler than sscanf)
I'd like to be able to contribute this file reader back into mainline someday.
Since PCRE is optional in the dev
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 01:14:37PM -0400, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
Since PCRE is optional in the dev docs, does that mean I can't
safely assume it's available in wireshark builds?
Yes, however, we recently started using GLib's GRegex functionality in
place of PCRE when running a high-enough
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:33:03AM -0600, Stephen Fisher wrote:
You can block out your wiretap code to only work when compiled with
GLib 2.14 (which is most people, including all of the automated builds
that people download) by using:
I failed to mention that this is because our minimum
Hi,
Thanks for the tip! (I had looked at GRegex but worried about older GLib, but
version checking is fine with me)
BTW, your answer of yes means I cannot safely use plain PCRE, or yes I can
safely use it?
-hadriel
On Sep 18, 2010, at 1:33 PM, Stephen Fisher wrote:
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 01:46:43PM -0400, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
Thanks for the tip! (I had looked at GRegex but worried about older
GLib, but version checking is fine with me) BTW, your answer of yes
means I cannot safely use plain PCRE, or yes I can safely use it?
You can use PCRE
OK, cool, got it.
thanks again!
On Sep 18, 2010, at 4:44 PM, Stephen Fisher wrote:
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 01:46:43PM -0400, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
Thanks for the tip! (I had looked at GRegex but worried about older
GLib, but version checking is fine with me) BTW, your answer of yes
