Is it a typo when fields are not registered to the parent protocol or should README.dissector describe if/when this is acceptable?
>From README.dissector: "abbrev (FIELDABBREV) --------------------A string with an abbreviation of the field. The abbreviation should startwith the abbreviation of the parent protocol followed by a period as aseparator." Protocol registration is handled by creating an instance of the header_field_info struct (or an array of such structs), and calling the registration function along with the registration ID of the protocol that is the parent of the fields. A few examples: https://www.wireshark.org/docs/dfref/f/ftp.html https://www.wireshark.org/docs/dfref/r/rtmac.html https://www.wireshark.org/docs/dfref/w/wpan.html
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
