Re: [Wireshark-dev] Ideas regarding bug 1025?

2006-08-11 Thread Anders Broman
PROTECTED] För Neil Piercy Skickat: den 10 augusti 2006 20:01 Till: Joerg Mayer Kopia: Developer support list for Wireshark Ämne: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Ideas regarding bug 1025? Joerg Mayer wrote: OK, I've created a small testprogram (under Suse 10.1) which you should compile as similar as possible

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Ideas regarding bug 1025?

2006-08-10 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 12:56:11PM +0100, Neil Piercy wrote: same execution path in this area. The big difference between the request and the response is that the _values_ of the 64 bit monotonic replay detection counter: the requests use very small values, the responses use huge values

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Ideas regarding bug 1025?

2006-08-04 Thread Neil Piercy
I did a little more investigation on this: The crash only happens trying to display the response packets in the bug trace - handling the request packets is fine, and both go through the same execution path in this area. The big difference between the request and the response is that the

[Wireshark-dev] Ideas regarding bug 1025?

2006-08-02 Thread Joerg Mayer
Hello, On Linux, I can't reproduce the crash mentioned in http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1025 Can someone please try to test this on Windows and maybe provide a stack trace? Thanks Joerg -- Joerg Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] We are

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Ideas regarding bug 1025?

2006-08-02 Thread Neil Piercy
Hi, The head of the stack just before the exception is given below. The actual error is in proto_tree_set_representation at the call: g_vsnprintf(fi-rep-representation, ITEM_LABEL_LENGTH, format, ap); The format has a single %I64x value needed. The entry to the routine throws an MSVC