Re: [Wireshark-dev] Thoughts on the default layout

2013-02-18 Thread Graham Bloice
On 16 February 2013 19:14, Ed Beroset bero...@mindspring.com wrote: Evan Huus wrote: I've been playing with various layouts for the main dissection interface and I've found one that works better (for me) than the default. It leaves the packet list on top, but puts the details and bytes

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Thoughts on the default layout

2013-02-18 Thread Jaap Keuter
On 02/18/2013 11:27 AM, Graham Bloice wrote: On 16 February 2013 19:14, Ed Beroset bero...@mindspring.com mailto:bero...@mindspring.com wrote: Evan Huus wrote: I've been playing with various layouts for the main dissection interface and I've found one that works better

[Wireshark-dev] Thoughts on the default layout

2013-02-16 Thread Evan Huus
I've been playing with various layouts for the main dissection interface and I've found one that works better (for me) than the default. It leaves the packet list on top, but puts the details and bytes panes side by side on the bottom (details on the left, bytes on the right). This is what you get

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Thoughts on the default layout

2013-02-16 Thread Ed Beroset
Evan Huus wrote: I've been playing with various layouts for the main dissection interface and I've found one that works better (for me) than the default. It leaves the packet list on top, but puts the details and bytes panes side by side on the bottom (details on the left, bytes on the right).