2012/8/19 Lori Jakab l...@lispmob.org
On 08/19/12 06:56, Pascal Quantin wrote:
Having a RSS link (or something similar) to the subversion file log
(
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/trunk/epan/dissectors/packet-gsmtap.c?view=log
for example) could be a way to easily monitor the changes
On 08/23/12 05:52, Pascal Quantin wrote:
2012/8/19 Lori Jakab l...@lispmob.org mailto:l...@lispmob.org
On 08/19/12 06:56, Pascal Quantin wrote:
Having a RSS link (or something similar) to the subversion file log
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Lori Jakab lja...@ac.upc.edu wrote:
On 08/23/12 05:52, Pascal Quantin wrote:
2012/8/19 Lori Jakab l...@lispmob.org mailto:l...@lispmob.org
On 08/19/12 06:56, Pascal Quantin wrote:
Having a RSS link (or something similar) to the subversion file log
On 08/19/12 06:56, Pascal Quantin wrote:
Having a RSS link (or something similar) to the subversion file log
(http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/trunk/epan/dissectors/packet-gsmtap.c?view=log
for example) could be a way to easily monitor the changes done to a
given file for whoever is
From: lafo...@gnumonks.org
1) Is this the way how the wireshark development model / flow is
supposed to work ?
Yes. The Wireshark model is that people submit patchs and then the Wireshark
core developers become the ongoing maintainers. This seems to have been
necessary for a long time
Hi all,
I understand that different FOSS projects have different cultures,
norms, rules, etc. However, my experience with wireshark it has reached
a point where I think a post like this is requierd.
I don't want to see this as some kind of flame, or to claim that the
wireshark development model
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Harald Welte lafo...@gnumonks.org wrote:
Hi all,
I understand that different FOSS projects have different cultures,
norms, rules, etc. However, my experience with wireshark it has reached
a point where I think a post like this is requierd.
I don't want to
2012/8/19 Harald Welte lafo...@gnumonks.org
Hi all,
I understand that different FOSS projects have different cultures,
norms, rules, etc. However, my experience with wireshark it has reached
a point where I think a post like this is requierd.
I don't want to see this as some kind of
Hi Pascal,
For me not all changes have the same potential of breakage: a change in an
API used by an external tool can easily lead to a complete incompatibility
(GSMTAP format unapproved changes for example) while a filter rename or a
wrong subtree used to display a field (GMR-1 breakages
Pascal Quantin pascal.quantin@... writes:
2012/8/19 Harald Welte lafo...@gnumonks.org
I agree that this massive filter rename could / should have been discussed
before being done
The changes that Michael is making regarding filter renaming stems from
10 matches
Mail list logo
