--- Guy Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen Fisher wrote:
My bad, it does work as I had intended. It highlights the field (with
the function highlight_field()) whenever you do a hex or string search,
but not when you do a filter search. Should we add filter search
matches too?
--- Stephen Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 02:43:13PM -0700, Stephen Fisher wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:29:12PM +0100, Stig Bj?rlykke wrote:
Does wireshark have any functionality like this? I know we have Find
Packet, but this does not display the
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 09:44:52AM -0800, Andrew Feren wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 02:43:13PM -0700, Stephen Fisher wrote:
My bad, it does work as I had intended. It highlights the field (with
the function highlight_field()) whenever you do a hex or string search,
but not when you
Hi.
Often, when I have a packet with alot of elements, it's a bit hard to
find the element matching the display filter. And when using a
complex filter it would be nice to know why each packet matches.
Does wireshark have any functionality like this? I know we have Find
Packet, but this
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:29:12PM +0100, Stig Bj?rlykke wrote:
Does wireshark have any functionality like this? I know we have Find
Packet, but this does not display the matching element in the packet.
Wireshark used to do this - I remember adding the feature myself. I'll
take a look at why
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 02:43:13PM -0700, Stephen Fisher wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:29:12PM +0100, Stig Bj?rlykke wrote:
Does wireshark have any functionality like this? I know we have Find
Packet, but this does not display the matching element in the packet.
Wireshark used to do
Stephen Fisher wrote:
My bad, it does work as I had intended. It highlights the field (with
the function highlight_field()) whenever you do a hex or string search,
but not when you do a filter search. Should we add filter search
matches too?
I'd say yes - if a search pattern of any sort
On 19. nov.. 2007, at 23.53, Stephen Fisher wrote:
My bad, it does work as I had intended. It highlights the field (with
the function highlight_field()) whenever you do a hex or string
search,
but not when you do a filter search.
I find this working with hex search, and string search in
On 19. nov.. 2007, at 23.58, Guy Harris wrote:
That does raise an interesting question - if a pattern matches *more
than one* field in a packet, should find next find the next instance
that matches, even if it's in the same packet, or should it find the
next instance in that packet and, if
