On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
> On Jun 24, 2016, at 1:14 PM, John Thacker wrote:
>
> > I am implementing fragment reassembly of PPP Multilink (RFC 1990) and
> also implementing multiclass extension (RFC 2686). (
> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12548
> h
On Jun 24, 2016, at 1:14 PM, John Thacker wrote:
> I am implementing fragment reassembly of PPP Multilink (RFC 1990) and also
> implementing multiclass extension (RFC 2686).
> (https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12548
> https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/16044/)
> The proto
I am implementing fragment reassembly of PPP Multilink (RFC 1990) and also
implementing multiclass extension (RFC 2686). (
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12548
https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/16044/)
The protocol is unlike other protocols that do reassembly. Most protocol
Still looking at the problem of minimal headers split across tcp segments...
Given a minimum header length of L, we only get L - k bytes of the
header at the end of the first packet. So we record in the reassembly
data structures that we need k more bytes. They come in the next
packet, and I thin
