Re: [Wireshark-dev] win32 buildbot unhappy

2007-08-28 Thread Bill Meier
Bill Meier wrote: > The specific problem: dumpcap calls capture_loop_start (in capture_loop.c) > which > calls capture_opts_log (in capture_opts.c) which then passes a null pointer to > glog (for iface_descr); glog then causes dumpcap to die > > A very quick look suggested I'd need to take

Re: [Wireshark-dev] win32 buildbot unhappy

2007-08-26 Thread Bill Meier
Jeff Morriss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I hope so, but it appears to have worked before my change and not after, > so... I'm a bit nervous. > Jeff: Your intuition is correct. The current version of dumpcap is crashing on Windows because of a null pointer in capture_opts->iface_descr a

Re: [Wireshark-dev] win32 buildbot unhappy

2007-08-24 Thread Gerald Combs
It's compiling OK now, but it's hanging on one of the capture tests. Jeff Morriss wrote: > I hope so, but it appears to have worked before my change and not after, > so... I'm a bit nervous. > > Luis EG Ontanon wrote: >> The question is can winpcap capture on a virtual interface of a virtual >

Re: [Wireshark-dev] win32 buildbot unhappy

2007-08-24 Thread Jeff Morriss
I hope so, but it appears to have worked before my change and not after, so... I'm a bit nervous. Luis EG Ontanon wrote: > The question is can winpcap capture on a virtual interface of a virtual > machine? > > I think it is waiting for a click (as it happened already in the past). > > I thin

Re: [Wireshark-dev] win32 buildbot unhappy

2007-08-24 Thread Luis EG Ontanon
The question is can winpcap capture on a virtual interface of a virtual machine? I think it is waiting for a click (as it happened already in the past). I think tests that assume anything being available on the system should be run with by a special target but not by the "all" target. Luis On 8

Re: [Wireshark-dev] win32 buildbot unhappy

2007-08-24 Thread Jeff Morriss
Gerald Combs wrote: > Graham Bloice wrote: >> The buildbot is reporting a permission problem. > > It looks like the GUI crashed during the "capture 10 packets" test, and > Windows popped up the "Wireshark has encountered a problem..." dialog. > I'll tweak the error reporting settings on the buil

Re: [Wireshark-dev] win32 buildbot unhappy

2007-08-24 Thread Richard van der Hoff
Gerald Combs wrote: > Graham Bloice wrote: >> The buildbot is reporting a permission problem. > > It looks like the GUI crashed during the "capture 10 packets" test, and > Windows popped up the "Wireshark has encountered a problem..." dialog. > I'll tweak the error reporting settings on the buil

Re: [Wireshark-dev] win32 buildbot unhappy

2007-08-23 Thread Gerald Combs
Graham Bloice wrote: > The buildbot is reporting a permission problem. It looks like the GUI crashed during the "capture 10 packets" test, and Windows popped up the "Wireshark has encountered a problem..." dialog. I'll tweak the error reporting settings on the builder. __

[Wireshark-dev] win32 buildbot unhappy

2007-08-23 Thread Graham Bloice
The buildbot is reporting a permission problem. -- Regards, Graham Bloice ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Win32 buildbot unhappy while building docs

2007-02-12 Thread Gerald Combs
amping >> Sent: 12 February 2007 04:52 >> To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org >> Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Win32 buildbot unhappy while building docs >> >> Hi! >> >> The buildbot currently has real problems building the

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Win32 buildbot unhappy while building docs

2007-02-12 Thread Douglas Pratley
debugging. Cheers Doug > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ulf Lamping > Sent: 12 February 2007 04:52 > To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org > Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Win32 buildbot unhappy while building docs > > Hi! >

[Wireshark-dev] Win32 buildbot unhappy while building docs

2007-02-11 Thread Ulf Lamping
Hi! The buildbot currently has real problems building the docbook docs and a look at the logs doesn't indicated to me what the problem is. Any ideas? Regards, ULFL ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mai