Guy Harris wrote:
gtk/win32-file-dlg.h
Gerald? That one's yours, I think
Fixed.
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
Joerg Mayer wrote:
Hopefully, all files should have a GPL compatible License. If not, then
we need to fix this. Otherwise, the default license is valid. I don't
understand the debian paranoia team here: either they have a valid
complaint (i.e. an *incompatible* license), then that's fine (I
Frederic Peters wrote:
This is about those files:
epan/epan.c
epan/exceptions.h
epan/dfilter/gencode.h
epan/dfilter/glib-util.c
epan/dfilter/glib-util.h
I think Gilbert Ramirez contributed the original versions of those; I
think all the rest of his contributions are GPL'ed -
I did the original NLM stuff.
Ill update packet-nlm.h
On 7/22/06, Guy Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frederic Peters wrote:
This is about those files:
epan/epan.c
epan/exceptions.h
epan/dfilter/gencode.h
epan/dfilter/glib-util.c
epan/dfilter/glib-util.h
I think
they are all under gpl compatible licences.
On 7/22/06, Frederic Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Mayer wrote:
Hopefully, all files should have a GPL compatible License. If not, then
we need to fix this. Otherwise, the default license is valid. I don't
understand the debian
Hopefully, all files should have a GPL compatible License. If not, then
we need to fix this. Otherwise, the default license is valid. I don't
understand the debian paranoia team here: either they have a valid
complaint (i.e. an *incompatible* license), then that's fine (I mean the
complaint).
On 7/19/06, Gerald Combs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Debian package approval process turned up several source files in
the Wireshark distribution that don't have explicit licenses. With the
exception of in_cksum.h, is there any reason these shouldn't be GPLed?
tap-funnel.c: no license
On 7/19/06, Gerald Combs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Debian package approval process turned up several source files in
the Wireshark distribution that don't have explicit licenses. With the
exception of in_cksum.h, is there any reason these shouldn't be GPLed?
snprintf.h:
no license
Gerald Combs wrote:
merge.c: missing license info, but based on ethereal work
mergecap.c: idem
Ok, I had a look at editcap.c, mergecap.c and merge.c
editcap.c was implemented by Richard Sharpe and Guy Harris, later
improved by others.
The Debian package approval process turned up several source files in
the Wireshark distribution that don't have explicit licenses. With the
exception of in_cksum.h, is there any reason these shouldn't be GPLed?
epan/in_cksum.h:
no license info (but most probably BSD, like in_cksum.c)
10 matches
Mail list logo
