Re: [Wireshark-dev] GTK+: Revert back to 2.24.14-1.1 on Win64.

2014-09-30 Thread Gerald Combs
On 9/30/14 4:54 AM, Anders Broman wrote: Hi, Don’t we need a new setup TAG as well for this to take effect? gtk+-bundle_2.24.14-1.1_win64ws.zip wasn't removed from the repository before tags/2014-07-27 was created, so it's part of that tag:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] GTK+: Revert back to 2.24.14-1.1 on Win64.

2014-09-30 Thread Anders Broman
But if I don't rerun setup I will build with the old GTK bundle, as that's what's unpacked into GTK dir - right? 2014-09-30 21:22 GMT+02:00 Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org: On 9/30/14 4:54 AM, Anders Broman wrote: Hi, Don’t we need a new setup TAG as well for this to take effect?

Re: [Wireshark-dev] GTK+: Revert back to 2.24.14-1.1 on Win64.

2014-09-30 Thread Gerald Combs
Correct. Is there a reason we don't use a unique name for the GTK+ library directory, e.g. gtk-2.24.23-1.1-win64ws instead of gtk2? It seems like that would avoid this sort of problem and simplify the Nmake files a bit. On 9/30/14 12:39 PM, Anders Broman wrote: But if I don't rerun setup I will