Re: [Wireshark-dev] Supported GnuTLS/glib/libgcrypt versions?

2015-10-15 Thread Peter Wu
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 12:03:41PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote: > > On Oct 14, 2015, at 11:25 AM, Peter Wu wrote: > > > Looks like GnuTLS is only needed if you have to supply a RSA private > > key. > > How much of it doe we use? > > If it's a sufficiently small amount, would

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Supported GnuTLS/glib/libgcrypt versions?

2015-10-15 Thread Peter Wu
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:44:56PM +0200, Anders Broman wrote: > Den 15 okt 2015 19:43 skrev "Jeff Morriss" : > > > > On 10/14/15 14:25, Peter Wu wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 02:02:18PM -0400, Jeff Morriss wrote: > >>> > >>> But you do raise a good point: I

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Supported GnuTLS/glib/libgcrypt versions?

2015-10-15 Thread Jeff Morriss
On 10/14/15 14:25, Peter Wu wrote: On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 02:02:18PM -0400, Jeff Morriss wrote: But you do raise a good point: I should start doing test compiles of the 2.0 rc on RHEL 6. I hadn't realized my users would have to continue using the Gtk+ GUI. Too bad... I have started testing

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Supported GnuTLS/glib/libgcrypt versions?

2015-10-15 Thread Guy Harris
On Oct 14, 2015, at 11:25 AM, Peter Wu wrote: > Looks like GnuTLS is only needed if you have to supply a RSA private > key. How much of it doe we use? If it's a sufficiently small amount, would it be worth just carving that part out and incorporating it directly into

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Supported GnuTLS/glib/libgcrypt versions?

2015-10-15 Thread Anders Broman
Den 15 okt 2015 19:43 skrev "Jeff Morriss" : > > On 10/14/15 14:25, Peter Wu wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 02:02:18PM -0400, Jeff Morriss wrote: >>> >>> But you do raise a good point: I should start doing test compiles of the 2.0 >>> rc on RHEL 6. I hadn't

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Supported GnuTLS/glib/libgcrypt versions?

2015-10-14 Thread Peter Wu
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 02:02:18PM -0400, Jeff Morriss wrote: > On 10/11/15 17:32, Peter Wu wrote: > >Hi, > > > >Michal reported to me that a recent change in the SSL dissector was not > >compatible with older GnuTLS versions[1]. > > > >The changes introduced the use of functions

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Supported GnuTLS/glib/libgcrypt versions?

2015-10-12 Thread Jeff Morriss
On 10/11/15 17:32, Peter Wu wrote: Hi, Michal reported to me that a recent change in the SSL dissector was not compatible with older GnuTLS versions[1]. The changes introduced the use of functions gnutls_pubkey_import and gnutls_pubkey_import_rsa_raw which were introduced with GnuTLS 2.12.0 in

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Supported GnuTLS/glib/libgcrypt versions?

2015-10-12 Thread Jeff Morriss
On 10/12/2015 07:07 PM, Gerald Combs wrote: On 10/12/15 11:02 AM, Jeff Morriss wrote: On 10/11/15 17:32, Peter Wu wrote: Hi, Michal reported to me that a recent change in the SSL dissector was not compatible with older GnuTLS versions[1]. The changes introduced the use of functions

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Supported GnuTLS/glib/libgcrypt versions?

2015-10-12 Thread Gerald Combs
On 10/12/15 11:02 AM, Jeff Morriss wrote: > On 10/11/15 17:32, Peter Wu wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Michal reported to me that a recent change in the SSL dissector was not >> compatible with older GnuTLS versions[1]. >> >> The changes introduced the use of functions gnutls_pubkey_import and >>

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Supported GnuTLS/glib/libgcrypt versions?

2015-10-11 Thread Michal Labedzki
On 11 October 2015 at 23:32, Peter Wu wrote: > Michal is using (RHEL6?) No. It is "LFS" :) I can always update version of GnuTLS or Qt (still use Qt 4.7.2), but there should be guard for GnuTLS to avoid build issue for some users (aka there should be beautiful message about