Hi Jakub,
2014-07-22 0:52 GMT+02:00 darkjames...@darkjames.pl:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 02:27:06AM +0200, B??lint R??czey wrote:
I plan using ASAN for all programs which would catch (among others)
use-after-free and reading below or over the malloc()-ed
memory area. Those can't be
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu
wrote:
Hi Jakub,
2014-07-22 0:52 GMT+02:00 darkjames...@darkjames.pl:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 02:27:06AM +0200, B??lint R??czey wrote:
I plan using ASAN for all programs which would catch (among others)
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:12:37PM +0200, B??lint R??czey wrote:
Please provide the input data for letting others reproduce the results
or perform the performance tests on pcap files already available to
the public.
I have only fake one:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 02:27:06AM +0200, B??lint R??czey wrote:
I plan using ASAN for all programs which would catch (among others)
use-after-free and reading below or over the malloc()-ed
memory area. Those can't be caught if the program uses another layer
of bulk memory allocations.
The biggest win, I think, would be if we can avoid calling free_chain at
all because tvbs are always allocated in the right scope and so get freed
automatically. I think this would involve touching every place that creates
new tvbs backed with glib memory though...
I will try and think about this
Hi All,
Please provide the input data for letting others reproduce the results
or perform the performance tests on pcap files already available to
the public.
I'm not a fan of implementing custom memory management methods because
partly because I highly doubt we can beat jemalloc easily on
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu
wrote:
Hi All,
Please provide the input data for letting others reproduce the results
or perform the performance tests on pcap files already available to
the public.
I'm not a fan of implementing custom memory management
Den 11 jul 2014 23:13 skrev Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu:
Hi All,
Please provide the input data for letting others reproduce the results
or perform the performance tests on pcap files already available to
the public
Ok I'll see if we can use something from the wiki instead.
I'm
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Evan Huus eapa...@gmail.com wrote:
The biggest win, I think, would be if we can avoid calling free_chain at
all because tvbs are always allocated in the right scope and so get freed
automatically. I think this would involve touching every place that creates
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Anders Broman a.broma...@gmail.com wrote:
Den 11 jul 2014 23:13 skrev Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu:
Hi All,
Please provide the input data for letting others reproduce the results
or perform the performance tests on pcap files already available
Hi Evan,
2014-07-11 23:51 GMT+02:00 Evan Huus eapa...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu
wrote:
Hi All,
Please provide the input data for letting others reproduce the results
or perform the performance tests on pcap files already available to
2014-07-12 0:07 GMT+02:00 Anders Broman a.broma...@gmail.com:
Den 11 jul 2014 23:13 skrev Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu:
Hi All,
Please provide the input data for letting others reproduce the results
or perform the performance tests on pcap files already available to
the public
: [Wireshark-dev] tvb allocator (was: Re: [Wireshark-commits]
master b6d20a2: Optimize reseting epan_dissect_t when filtering.)
To: Bálint Reczey bal...@balintreczey.hu
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu
wrote:
Hi Evan,
2014-07-11 23:51 GMT+02:00 Evan Huus eapa
13 matches
Mail list logo
