2015-01-16 3:40 GMT+01:00 Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu:
On Jan 15, 2015, at 1:54 PM, Pascal Quantin (Code Review)
code-review-do-not-re...@wireshark.org wrote:
Pascal Quantin has uploaded a new change for review.
https://code.wireshark.org/review/6560
Change subject: USB: do not
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:31 AM, Bill Meier wme...@newsguy.com wrote:
On 1/15/2015 10:44 AM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
On 01/15/15 10:21, Evan Huus wrote:
Public service announcement, since I've gotten a few emails from
people confused why bugzilla integration seems flaky:
The bugzilla
A few weeks ago I stumbled across the following comment in address_to_str.c:
/*XXX FIXME the code below may be called very very frequently in the future.
optimize it for speed and get rid of the slow sprintfs */
/* XXX - perhaps we should have individual address types register
a table of
I already posted this question to Ask.Wireshark.org; as I have a very tight
schedule and realise the mailing list is more appropriate, I am posting it here
as well. Please advice me if I need to remove the other post.
I am implementing object export for the
Hi all,
I have a very quick question: am I supposed to create deb packages by doing
make debian-package? The makefile doesn't recognize that option :(
Thanks,
Juanjo Martin
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Hi Juanjo,
2015-01-16 17:04 GMT+01:00 Juan Jose Martin Carrascosa jua...@rti.com:
Hi all,
I have a very quick question: am I supposed to create deb packages by doing
make debian-package? The makefile doesn't recognize that option :(
No, by running dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot.
Cheers,
Balint
It works perfectly. Many thanks for the prompt answer.
Juanjo Martin
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu
wrote:
Hi Juanjo,
2015-01-16 17:04 GMT+01:00 Juan Jose Martin Carrascosa jua...@rti.com:
Hi all,
I have a very quick question: am I supposed to
2015-01-16 16:07 GMT+01:00 leonardoc...@libero.it leonardoc...@libero.it:
I already posted this question to Ask.Wireshark.org; as I have a very
tight schedule and realise the mailing list is more appropriate, I am
posting it here as well. Please advice me if I need to remove the other
post.
On Jan 16, 2015, at 6:04 AM, mman...@netscape.net wrote:
A few weeks ago I stumbled across the following comment in address_to_str.c:
/*XXX FIXME the code below may be called very very frequently in the future.
optimize it for speed and get rid of the slow sprintfs */
/* XXX - perhaps
I still like the idea of the address types being centrally registered (in
epan directory) and not put into the dissector code, mostly because many of the
address types are used in multiple dissector/protocols. You may also introduce
epan dependencies (like from proto.c) with the dissectors,
On Jan 16, 2015, at 11:34 AM, mman...@netscape.net wrote:
I still like the idea of the address types being centrally registered (in
epan directory) and not put into the dissector code, mostly because many of
the address types are used in multiple dissector/protocols.
Perhaps libwireshark
11 matches
Mail list logo
