Hi
Yes you should use the wtap_opttype_register_custom_block_type structure.
In theory, the data from the block get's stored inside the necessary wtap
structures and can later be accessible via packet_info if I remember
correctly. Or you could also write a separate dissector, store the data
from
Hi Roland.
Does that mean that from within a dissector I could:
* Register the new block type
* Get access to the new block data from the dissector
Basically, can I do everything from a new dissector and not touch Wireshark
core code?
Thanks and regards…Paul
From: Wireshark-dev
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:05 AM, Gerald Combs wrote:
> On 1/13/18 4:16 AM, Stig Bjørlykke wrote:
>> - Qt: Missing string translations after source code was moved to
>> utils/models/manager/widgets subdirectories
>
> Do you know what's missing? This shouldn't be too hard to
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 1:39 PM, Anders Broman
wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wireshark-dev [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On
> Behalf Of Gerald Combs
> Sent: den 17 januari 2018 02:05
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
-Original Message-
From: Wireshark-dev [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of
Gerald Combs
Sent: den 17 januari 2018 02:05
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] 2.5.0 release on January 16
On 1/13/18 4:16
I want to make a start on the plan below. Last night I took a look at the
relevant code.
I started by adding support for TSDBs into the function pcapng_open(…) in
pcapng.c but I then stumbled across wtap_opttype_register_custom_block_type(…)
in wtap_opttypes.c which seems to be a framework to