Re: [Wireshark-dev] Need help on Reassembly and building ethereal on windows.

2006-11-15 Thread ronnie sahlberg
Yes. The current tcp reassembly code is rewritten and it has also fixed the issue you mention. (When fixing that issue, it also uncovered a bug with HTTP reassembly that was also fixed recently) Please use the latest SVN version of wireshark sources. On 11/15/06, Anders Broman [EMAIL

[Wireshark-dev] Glib.h Missing???

2006-11-15 Thread trefor.2.edwards
Title: Glib.h Missing??? I'm doing something stupid I know but ... I've downloaded the source wireshark-0.99.5-SVN-19892.tar.gz and installed it but when I try to build Wireshark I get Cannot open include file: 'glib.h': I've search the directories and there is no sign of glib.h.

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Need help on Reassembly and building ethereal on windows.

2006-11-15 Thread John R.
If you get a lot of PDUs spanning tcp segments you may run into this too: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1124 -- John. ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org

Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to retrieve/modify a tree string

2006-11-15 Thread Guy Harris
Bill Florac wrote: Is there an easy way to amend the display text for an item inserted in a tree with proto_tree_add_item(). Like proto_item_append_text() but I need to insert text into or in front of the existing text. For example, if I want to display an array of items that all use the same

[Wireshark-dev] Fwd: [Ethereal-dev] Questions on XML/DTD for MSCML support

2006-11-15 Thread LEGO
few months later both issues are solved... (revision 19903) On 5/15/06, Jacques, Olivier (OpenCall Test Infra) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I am working on implementing MSCML support in Ethereal (http://ietfreport.isoc.org/idref/draft-vandyke-mscml/ or

[Wireshark-dev] Question regarding RTCP protocol

2006-11-15 Thread Andreina Toro
Hi everyone, I have a question regarding RTCP protocol. I have to measure the jitter, packet loss and roundtrip delay for each call. I know that in the statistics menu inthe RTP Stream Window I can read the Mean Jitter and Packet Loss per call, and if inthe general window I filter the RTCP

[Wireshark-dev] Bonjour! Avez-vous une soeur appelee Sabrina?

2006-11-15 Thread Sophie Mayerhoeffer
Merci, Sophie M. ___ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to retrieve/modify a tree string

2006-11-15 Thread Ulf Lamping
Guy Harris wrote: Unfortunately, there's currently no way to do that - and there's no proto_tree_add_item_format() for that; you could use the other proto_tree_add_XXX_format() routines. This sort of thing is - arrays or sequences of entries of the same type - is, I suspect, common

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 19901: /trunk/ /trunk/dtds/: mscml.dtd /trunk/packaging/nsis/: wireshark.nsi /trunk/: Makefile.am

2006-11-15 Thread Ulf Lamping
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=19901 User: martinm Date: 2006/11/15 05:27 PM Log: From Olivier Jacques: Here is a DTD for the MSCML protocol, draft-07. This implementation is not entirely up-to-date (draft-09 is out), but

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Replace ntohl() with g_ntohl() - automated check?

2006-11-15 Thread Ulf Lamping
Hi Jeff! First of all, a big thank you to take some time to look at this topic. I guess the only way to improve the current situation is to find an automated way to find stuff like this and your approach looks promissing. Although my perl knowledge is very limited, I was able to read and

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Regarding bug 948 - capture vs preferences

2006-11-15 Thread Jeff Morriss
Ulf Lamping wrote: Stephen Fisher wrote: I am looking at bug #948, Apply capture preferences not applying. The problem reported is that if you update a preference such as Update list of packets in real time and hit apply/OK then go to the capture options screen, the change is not

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Regarding bug 948 - capture vs preferences

2006-11-15 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, Stephen Fisher wrote: I am looking at bug #948, Apply capture preferences not applying. The problem reported is that if you update a preference such as Update list of packets in real time and hit apply/OK then go to the capture options screen, the change is not